Latest Interviews
Showing 3001–3002 of 3,002 transcripts.
Clear all filters- Milken Institute1h 21m
Milken Institute Forum: Todd Buchholz
Todd Buchholz, Skip, Debbie, Dick Fredericks, Henny Youngman, E.F. Schumacher, Jimmy Carter, Robert Redford, Shirley Temple, Julia Child, Jackie Robinson, George Washington, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Stalin, Daniel Gilbert, Richard Frank, Mandela, Steve Jobs, Dalai Lama, Mother Teresa, Fidel, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Mark Twain, Ronald Reagan, Pope John Paul II, Jonas Salk, Watson, Crick, Harry, Lucille Ball, Ethel, Kiyosaki, Tom Cruise, Ozzie, Harriet, Beaver, Theodore Roosevelt, Milton Berle, Joe Biden, Yao Ming, John Taylor, Al Gore, John Mackey
Todd Buchholz argues that human rushing, biological stress, and economic competition are essential drivers of happiness, freedom, and historical progress, refuting narratives that advocate for retreat into simplicity. He supports this thesis with neuroscientific evidence showing that risk-taking stimulates cognitive function, historical data proving capitalism's role in extending life expectancy, and corporate case studies like General Motors illustrating the inefficiency of suppressed competition. Buchholz concludes that removing competitive pressure leads to stagnation and tyranny, while maintaining that freedom and merit-based incentives are necessary to sustain the ongoing rise in human prosperity and longevity.
- Milken Institute7 min
2008 State of the State - Funding State Government
This analysis attributes California's budgeting crisis to a deficit in governance capacity driven by structural flaws like term limits, gerrymandered districts, and an overreliance on the initiative process rather than partisan gridlock. It contrasts the state's declining legislative performance with historical bipartisan precedents of fiscal responsibility, advocating for reforms such as multi-year budgeting, strengthened rainy day funds, and an open primary system to restore institutional trust. The presentation concludes that without these structural changes to foster consensus-based leadership, California risks political upheaval and a loss of future competitiveness.