newsfilter.io
Interview, Fireside Chat, Conference Presentation

a16z Podcast | Verizon Plus AOL -- Why? -- The Short Answer is Mobile

  • Transaction Details

    • Verizon agreed to acquire AOL for $4.4 billion.
    • Frank Chen noted the deal was "low on the list" or unexpected prior to the announcement.
  • Strategic Rationale for Verizon

    • Verizon aims to transition from a "dumb pipe" utility into a value-added content and media provider.
    • The acquisition is driven by a belief that cable bundles are dissolving as millennials shift roughly five hours of daily media consumption to mobile phones.
    • Verizon already attempted this strategy by unbundling sports content, such as its premium NFL streaming deal.
    • The company seeks to avoid becoming a commoditized infrastructure provider while content moves to mobile video.
  • Strategic Value of AOL for Verizon

    • Ad Tech and Data Integration:
      • Verizon intends to combine its network data with AOL's advertising technology to solve mobile cross-device tracking.
      • The acquisition allows Verizon to identify users across phones, iPads, and apps by leveraging network-level data where traditional cookie tracking fails.
      • The primary value is attributed to user tracking capabilities rather than AOL's specific content assets (e.g., HuffPost, TechCrunch).
    • Video Production and Distribution:
      • Verizon and AOL are positioning for a shift toward crowdsourced funding and production for independent video creators.
      • AOL Studios offers HD production facilities for independent showrunners who may be funded by direct fan contributions.
      • Verizon plans to utilize this content to build new distribution channels and monetization models for mobile video.
  • Regulatory and Net Neutrality Implications

    • The acquisition likely represents the largest purchase Verizon can make without triggering immediate major regulatory oversight.
    • The deal creates potential pathways to bypass net neutrality restrictions through "zero rating."
      • Example: Verizon could waive data caps specifically for AOL content while charging standard rates for other services.
    • Concerns exist regarding the lack of a "Chinese wall" between Verizon's network operations (which possess granular user location and behavior data) and its new advertising business.
  • Industry Trends and Competitive Landscape

    • The deal signals the end of "swim lane" separation; competitors like Google and Facebook are building internet access, while carriers like Verizon are entering content creation and TV.
    • The market is evolving from a core competency model (e.g., Microsoft) to a vertically integrated model (e.g., Apple) where companies own the device, network, and content.
    • Verizon's control over smartphones allows them to access precise user data, including zip codes derived from sleep locations.
    • This move may trigger a new wave of M&A among Verizon's competitors and ad-tech firms fearing they are being outflanked.
  • Historical Context of Ad-Tech M&A Waves

    • Chris Dixon identified four distinct waves of ad-technology consolidation:
      • Wave 1 (Display): Google acquired DoubleClick; Yahoo acquired Right Media.
      • Wave 2 (Social): Companies like Buddy Media and Wildfire were acquired; Oracle acquired Virtue.
      • Wave 3 (Mobile): The prior wave involving AdMob and Quattro "fizzled" because mobile ads did not become the dominant monetization model.
      • Wave 4 (TBD): The current landscape focuses on mobile tracking, attribution, and programmatic app advertising.
    • Dixon's historical advice suggests that when incumbents consolidate in a specific sector, non-integrated startups face an existential threat similar to a game of "musical chairs."
  • Forward-Looking Statements

    • Verizon is betting that the entire video-to-mobile value chain—funding, creation, discovery, and distribution—is being disrupted and must be owned end-to-end.
    • The industry expects continued aggression from major tech players (Google, Facebook) entering infrastructure, and carriers entering content.
    • There is speculation that the "dumb pipe" strategy will eventually fail, and future success depends on vertical integration of networks and content.