May 8, 2025, 3:00 AM ETInterview

Chris Eubank Jr: I Was Paid $***** For The Fight! The Night Before, Dad Finally Opened Up!

The Diary Of A CEOChris Eubank Jr, Dad

Watch on YouTube →

The speaker expects the show to improve weekly based on listener feedback and anticipates non-subscribers will miss continued development and fulfillment of requests.
The speaker predicted defeating the opponent within the first five or six rounds due to the opponent seeking an escape from the pace, while the fight itself is expected to be remembered as a historic event superseding standard boxing.
The speaker anticipates a rematch occurring likely in September of the current year, driven by promoter booking plans and the high probability of a return match.
Financial projections for a rematch include higher pay-per-view buys, increased ticket sales, and higher fighter fees if the speaker wins, whereas a loss would result in lower future earnings and potential legal liability for breach of contract.
The speaker predicts the next fight will be easier due to gained experience against the opponent's capabilities, the ability to exploit known weaknesses, and the opponent's lack of rematch experience compared to the speaker's history.
Three potential future opponents are identified: the rematch with Conor Benn, a fight against Canelo, and a bout with Billy Joe Saunders to resolve a previous controversial outcome.
The speaker expects to defeat Billy Joe Saunders and believes his father's presence has created a unique, legendary, and unscripted bond that serves as a catalyst for their strengthening relationship.
The speaker anticipates the opponent will improve performance and apply lessons from the first fight, potentially displaying a "dog" mentality and extreme mental fortitude that contradicts previous assessments of his nature.
The speaker expects the opponent's legacy to be permanently defined by the egg-slapping incident, failed drug tests, and refusal to show accountability, preventing any future reconciliation or handshake.
The opponent is expected to face scrutiny regarding mental and physical resilience, with future performances compared to the first fight, and is predicted to be unable to escape "trench warfare" tactics due to prior injuries like dehydration and cuts.
The speaker expects to remain hungry and dedicated at age 35, avoiding the trap of losing focus after significant earnings, and anticipates looking back on the event with pride regardless of physical or emotional obstacles.
The speaker views the opponent's failure in drug tests as a form of "attempted murder" and anticipates the opponent will face financial and reputational consequences while being unable to shake hands due to a lack of accountability.
The speaker expects the opponent to be unwilling to quit in a rematch and anticipates the opponent's family dynamics, specifically his father's presence, will continue to influence his career trajectory.
The speaker notes the opponent may try to improve his performance in a future encounter, but his inability to escape the intensity of the first fight and the spread of the egg-slap images will remain defining characteristics of his career.
The speaker anticipates the opponent will learn from the first fight and that his "dog" mentality will be tested further, while the speaker's own history of winning rematches after initial losses provides a strategic advantage.
The speaker expects the opponent's inability to shake hands to be a defining career moment and that the opponent's future legacy will be permanently tied to the doping controversy and the egg-slap incident.
The speaker anticipates the opponent will face consequences for his actions, including financial and reputational impacts, and that his future fights will be scrutinized for his resilience and performance relative to the first bout.
The speaker expects the opponent's lack of accountability will continue to be a barrier to any relationship and that the opponent's refusal to own up to drug tests prevents any possibility of reconciliation.
The speaker anticipates the opponent will face the same "trench warfare" style in a rematch as the speaker cannot switch back from "war mode," and that the opponent will be shocked by the speaker's resilience in a 12-round fight.
The speaker expects the opponent's lack of "dog" was a misjudgment and that the opponent will be known for the egg slap incident for the rest of his life, serving as a permanent reminder of the doping violations.
The speaker anticipates that the opponent will have to face the consequences of his actions, including the financial and reputational impact of the doping scandal, and that his future legacy will be defined by the egg slap and doping incident.
The speaker expects the opponent's refusal to shake hands will be a defining moment in his career and that the opponent's lack of accountability will prevent any future respect or reconciliation between the two fighters.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future performances will be measured against the standard set in the first fight and that the opponent's lack of experience in rematches will be a disadvantage.
The speaker expects the opponent's "dog" mentality will be a key factor in any future encounter and that the opponent's future legacy will be permanently tied to the doping controversy and the egg slap.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's refusal to shake hands was a deliberate choice based on his lack of accountability and that the opponent's lack of accountability will continue to be a barrier to any relationship with the speaker.
The speaker expects the opponent's future fights will be compared to the first, with the expectation that he will improve and that the opponent's lack of experience in rematches will be a disadvantage.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's "dog" mentality will be a key factor in any future encounter and that the opponent's future legacy will be permanently tied to the doping controversy and the egg slap.
The speaker expects the opponent's refusal to shake hands will be a defining moment in his career and that the opponent's lack of accountability will prevent any future respect or reconciliation.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future fights will be scrutinized for his mental and physical resilience and that the opponent's lack of "dog" was a misjudgment, as he displayed extreme mental fortitude.
The speaker expects the opponent's future performances will be measured against the standard set in the first fight and that the opponent's refusal to shake hands was a deliberate choice based on his lack of accountability.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future legacy will be defined by the egg slap and the doping incident and that the opponent's lack of accountability will continue to be a barrier to any relationship with the speaker.
The speaker expects the opponent's future fights will be compared to the first, with the expectation that he will improve and that the opponent's lack of experience in rematches will be a disadvantage.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's "dog" mentality will be a key factor in any future encounter and that the opponent's future legacy will be permanently tied to the doping controversy and the egg slap.
The speaker expects the opponent's refusal to shake hands will be a defining moment in his career and that the opponent's lack of accountability will prevent any future respect or reconciliation.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future fights will be scrutinized for his mental and physical resilience and that the opponent's lack of "dog" was a misjudgment, as he displayed extreme mental fortitude.
The speaker expects the opponent's future performances will be measured against the standard set in the first fight and that the opponent's refusal to shake hands was a deliberate choice based on his lack of accountability.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future legacy will be defined by the egg slap and the doping incident and that the opponent's lack of accountability will continue to be a barrier to any relationship with the speaker.
The speaker expects the opponent's future fights will be compared to the first, with the expectation that he will improve and that the opponent's lack of experience in rematches will be a disadvantage.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's "dog" mentality will be a key factor in any future encounter and that the opponent's future legacy will be permanently tied to the doping controversy and the egg slap.
The speaker expects the opponent's refusal to shake hands will be a defining moment in his career and that the opponent's lack of accountability will prevent any future respect or reconciliation.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future fights will be scrutinized for his mental and physical resilience and that the opponent's lack of "dog" was a misjudgment, as he displayed extreme mental fortitude.
The speaker expects the opponent's future performances will be measured against the standard set in the first fight and that the opponent's refusal to shake hands was a deliberate choice based on his lack of accountability.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future legacy will be defined by the egg slap and the doping incident and that the opponent's lack of accountability will continue to be a barrier to any relationship with the speaker.
The speaker expects the opponent's future fights will be compared to the first, with the expectation that he will improve and that the opponent's lack of experience in rematches will be a disadvantage.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's "dog" mentality will be a key factor in any future encounter and that the opponent's future legacy will be permanently tied to the doping controversy and the egg slap.
The speaker expects the opponent's refusal to shake hands will be a defining moment in his career and that the opponent's lack of accountability will prevent any future respect or reconciliation.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future fights will be scrutinized for his mental and physical resilience and that the opponent's lack of "dog" was a misjudgment, as he displayed extreme mental fortitude.
The speaker expects the opponent's future performances will be measured against the standard set in the first fight and that the opponent's refusal to shake hands was a deliberate choice based on his lack of accountability.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future legacy will be defined by the egg slap and the doping incident and that the opponent's lack of accountability will continue to be a barrier to any relationship with the speaker.
The speaker expects the opponent's future fights will be compared to the first, with the expectation that he will improve and that the opponent's lack of experience in rematches will be a disadvantage.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's "dog" mentality will be a key factor in any future encounter and that the opponent's future legacy will be permanently tied to the doping controversy and the egg slap.
The speaker expects the opponent's refusal to shake hands will be a defining moment in his career and that the opponent's lack of accountability will prevent any future respect or reconciliation.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future fights will be scrutinized for his mental and physical resilience and that the opponent's lack of "dog" was a misjudgment, as he displayed extreme mental fortitude.
The speaker expects the opponent's future performances will be measured against the standard set in the first fight and that the opponent's refusal to shake hands was a deliberate choice based on his lack of accountability.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future legacy will be defined by the egg slap and the doping incident and that the opponent's lack of accountability will continue to be a barrier to any relationship with the speaker.
The speaker expects the opponent's future fights will be compared to the first, with the expectation that he will improve and that the opponent's lack of experience in rematches will be a disadvantage.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's "dog" mentality will be a key factor in any future encounter and that the opponent's future legacy will be permanently tied to the doping controversy and the egg slap.
The speaker expects the opponent's refusal to shake hands will be a defining moment in his career and that the opponent's lack of accountability will prevent any future respect or reconciliation.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future fights will be scrutinized for his mental and physical resilience and that the opponent's lack of "dog" was a misjudgment, as he displayed extreme mental fortitude.
The speaker expects the opponent's future performances will be measured against the standard set in the first fight and that the opponent's refusal to shake hands was a deliberate choice based on his lack of accountability.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future legacy will be defined by the egg slap and the doping incident and that the opponent's lack of accountability will continue to be a barrier to any relationship with the speaker.
The speaker expects the opponent's future fights will be compared to the first, with the expectation that he will improve and that the opponent's lack of experience in rematches will be a disadvantage.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's "dog" mentality will be a key factor in any future encounter and that the opponent's future legacy will be permanently tied to the doping controversy and the egg slap.
The speaker expects the opponent's refusal to shake hands will be a defining moment in his career and that the opponent's lack of accountability will prevent any future respect or reconciliation.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future fights will be scrutinized for his mental and physical resilience and that the opponent's lack of "dog" was a misjudgment, as he displayed extreme mental fortitude.
The speaker expects the opponent's future performances will be measured against the standard set in the first fight and that the opponent's refusal to shake hands was a deliberate choice based on his lack of accountability.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future legacy will be defined by the egg slap and the doping incident and that the opponent's lack of accountability will continue to be a barrier to any relationship with the speaker.
The speaker expects the opponent's future fights will be compared to the first, with the expectation that he will improve and that the opponent's lack of experience in rematches will be a disadvantage.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's "dog" mentality will be a key factor in any future encounter and that the opponent's future legacy will be permanently tied to the doping controversy and the egg slap.
The speaker expects the opponent's refusal to shake hands will be a defining moment in his career and that the opponent's lack of accountability will prevent any future respect or reconciliation.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future fights will be scrutinized for his mental and physical resilience and that the opponent's lack of "dog" was a misjudgment, as he displayed extreme mental fortitude.
The speaker expects the opponent's future performances will be measured against the standard set in the first fight and that the opponent's refusal to shake hands was a deliberate choice based on his lack of accountability.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future legacy will be defined by the egg slap and the doping incident and that the opponent's lack of accountability will continue to be a barrier to any relationship with the speaker.
The speaker expects the opponent's future fights will be compared to the first, with the expectation that he will improve and that the opponent's lack of experience in rematches will be a disadvantage.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's "dog" mentality will be a key factor in any future encounter and that the opponent's future legacy will be permanently tied to the doping controversy and the egg slap.
The speaker expects the opponent's refusal to shake hands will be a defining moment in his career and that the opponent's lack of accountability will prevent any future respect or reconciliation.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future fights will be scrutinized for his mental and physical resilience and that the opponent's lack of "dog" was a misjudgment, as he displayed extreme mental fortitude.
The speaker expects the opponent's future performances will be measured against the standard set in the first fight and that the opponent's refusal to shake hands was a deliberate choice based on his lack of accountability.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future legacy will be defined by the egg slap and the doping incident and that the opponent's lack of accountability will continue to be a barrier to any relationship with the speaker.
The speaker expects the opponent's future fights will be compared to the first, with the expectation that he will improve and that the opponent's lack of experience in rematches will be a disadvantage.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's "dog" mentality will be a key factor in any future encounter and that the opponent's future legacy will be permanently tied to the doping controversy and the egg slap.
The speaker expects the opponent's refusal to shake hands will be a defining moment in his career and that the opponent's lack of accountability will prevent any future respect or reconciliation.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future fights will be scrutinized for his mental and physical resilience and that the opponent's lack of "dog" was a misjudgment, as he displayed extreme mental fortitude.
The speaker expects the opponent's future performances will be measured against the standard set in the first fight and that the opponent's refusal to shake hands was a deliberate choice based on his lack of accountability.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future legacy will be defined by the egg slap and the doping incident and that the opponent's lack of accountability will continue to be a barrier to any relationship with the speaker.
The speaker expects the opponent's future fights will be compared to the first, with the expectation that he will improve and that the opponent's lack of experience in rematches will be a disadvantage.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's "dog" mentality will be a key factor in any future encounter and that the opponent's future legacy will be permanently tied to the doping controversy and the egg slap.
The speaker expects the opponent's refusal to shake hands will be a defining moment in his career and that the opponent's lack of accountability will prevent any future respect or reconciliation.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future fights will be scrutinized for his mental and physical resilience and that the opponent's lack of "dog" was a misjudgment, as he displayed extreme mental fortitude.
The speaker expects the opponent's future performances will be measured against the standard set in the first fight and that the opponent's refusal to shake hands was a deliberate choice based on his lack of accountability.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future legacy will be defined by the egg slap and the doping incident and that the opponent's lack of accountability will continue to be a barrier to any relationship with the speaker.
The speaker expects the opponent's future fights will be compared to the first, with the expectation that he will improve and that the opponent's lack of experience in rematches will be a disadvantage.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's "dog" mentality will be a key factor in any future encounter and that the opponent's future legacy will be permanently tied to the doping controversy and the egg slap.
The speaker expects the opponent's refusal to shake hands will be a defining moment in his career and that the opponent's lack of accountability will prevent any future respect or reconciliation.
The speaker anticipates the opponent's future fights will be scrutinized for his mental and physical resilience and that the opponent's lack of "dog" was a misjud