newsfilter.io
Podcast, Fireside Chat

E73: Late-stage VC markdowns and mistakes, market strategy, Ukraine/Russia update with Brad Gerstner

Market Analysis and Valuation Normalization

  • Market Repricing as Normalization: Brad Gershner characterizes recent market declines not as a collapse, but as a necessary normalization from the "historic red bull high" of 2020–2021, where growth multiples were 30–50% above the five-year pre-pandemic average.
  • The Impact of Real Rates: The market's fear stems from the Fed's projected exit of 2% negative real rates, with expected inflation of 4.3% and 10-year yields around 2.3%; this contrasts sharply with prior protocols where 4% inflation would have required rates of 4.5%, necessitating a 30% reduction in growth multiples.
  • Valuation Rule of Thumb: Brad and Chamath establish a rule of thumb that for every 100 basis point increase in interest rates, software and tech company valuations must be discounted by 15–20%.
  • Projected Rate Increases: Citi and Goldman Sachs raised their exit yield forecasts for 2022 to 2.7% and 2023 to 3.5%, indicating a sustained period of higher rates and uncertainty.
  • Late-Stage Venture Mispricing: Late-stage venture valuations are predicted to be mispriced by 50–60%, with public comps like Instacart, Uber, DoorDash, and Takeaway already trading down 50–70% from their 2021 peaks.
  • IPO Down Rounds Forecast: The panel predicts that the vast majority of late-stage companies going public in the next 12 months will trade at valuations below their last private round ("down round IPOs"), as the "automatic gain" arbitrage of the previous bull market no longer exists.
  • Stripping of Protective Provisions: Many late-stage deals executed during the boom lacked "IPO ratchets" (downside protection), leaving late-stage investors as "price takers" who will suffer direct losses if IPO valuations collapse.
  • Sector-Specific Vulnerabilities: Business models reliant on zero-cost capital are identified as high-risk, specifically:
    • Delivery Services: Capital-intensive "nth player" companies (e.g., GoPuff, 15-minute delivery) face existential threats due to inefficient unit economics in a high-cost environment.
    • Neobanks: Financial services that arbitrage the spread between zero-cost deposits and low lending rates are at risk as their cost of capital rises to 2–3%.
    • Low-End SaaS: Companies dependent on expensive customer acquisition (CAC) via Google/Facebook face margin compression as input costs rise faster than they can raise prices.

Strategic Shifts for Entrepreneurs and Investors

  • The "Burn Multiple" Metric: David Sacks introduces "burn multiple" (cash burn per dollar of incremental ARR) as a critical governance metric:
    • 1.0x or less: Excellent performance.
    • 1.0x – 2.0x: Good performance.
    • >2.5x: Problematic.
    • >3.0x: Bad; indicates a business model requiring 3–5 years to recoup capital, which is unsustainable in the current rate environment.
  • Shift from Growth-at-All-Costs: The "three things that matter" in the current down market are growth, burn, and margins; founders must now make trade-offs between speed of growth and capital efficiency to avoid running out of runway.
  • Flight to Quality: Investors are compressing portfolios into "must-own" companies (e.g., Snowflake, FANGs) where growth is durable (e.g., Snowflake growing FCF by >100% YoY), allowing them to withstand multiple compression through sheer earnings growth.
  • Venture Capital Discipline Failure: The panel attributes the current valuation crash to "sloppy behavior" by VCs who, in a boom market, prioritized deal velocity over business fundamentals, hired inexperienced junior partners as "make-work construction workers," and suspended disbelief on unit economics.
  • Exit Strategy for Founders: Founders are advised to lengthen runways, reduce headcount, and focus on profitability (EBITDA positive) within 12–24 months to survive the "psychic reset" of the market.

Geopolitical Analysis: The War in Ukraine

  • Potential Peace Deal Framework: A peace deal is viewed as likely, consisting of Ukraine's neutrality (no NATO membership), Russia retaining Crimea (a fait accompli since 2014), and regional autonomy/independence for the Donbass region.
  • US Strategy of Protraction: The panel argues the US administration may be intentionally protracting the conflict to inflict an "Afghan-style" debilitating defeat on Russia, prioritizing the destabilization of the Russian regime over a quick negotiated ceasefire.
  • Economic Statecraft Doctrine: The US is described as shifting from the "Powell Doctrine" (military force) to a new "Blinken Doctrine" of "overwhelming economic force," using sanctions as a nuclear option to signal to China and other adversaries that violating global norms incurs massive economic costs.
  • Escalation Risks: The conflict may worsen before stabilizing, with potential for a full European embargo on Russian oil (raising prices to $180–$200) and increased Russian military aggression as a bargaining chip.
  • Nuclear Rhetoric: The panel criticizes the administration's deviation from Biden's 2020 campaign promise to use nuclear weapons only in response to a nuclear attack, now citing "extreme circumstances" which raises the risk of miscalculation.
  • Diplomatic Failure: Chamath and David Sacks argue that US diplomacy failed to prevent the war (e.g., not publicly guaranteeing Ukraine's non-NATO status) and now lacks the influence to force a rapid settlement, with the US no longer viewed as an honest broker by Russia.

Macroeconomic Outlook and China

  • China as Economic Anchor: China's extension of tax cuts and stimulative measures is presented as essential because a global slowdown (driven by high US oil prices, reduced consumer spending, and rate hikes) threatens China's export-driven 5.5% GDP growth target.
  • Recession vs. Inflation: The Fed is suspected to be behind the curve regarding inflation, with significant evidence pointing toward a recession driven by demand destruction (e.g., $6/gas, higher mortgage rates crushing buying power).
  • Global Interdependence: The "de-globalization" narrative is challenged; the panel asserts that the US and China are inextricably linked, and a Chinese recession would inevitably trigger a US recession.
  • PMI and Confidence Indicators: The Producer Price Index (PMI) for January missed expectations (0.2 vs 0.6 consensus), and consumer confidence has plummeted, signaling an incoming global slowdown.

All-In Summit Announcements

  • Event Details: The All-In Summit is scheduled for May 15–17 in Miami at the New World Symphony, with 500 of 650 tickets sold and 200 scholarships distributed.
  • Format: Speakers will deliver 15–20 minute "TED-style" position papers, followed by back-to-back discussions with the hosts.
  • Confirmed Speakers: Key figures include Kimbal Musk (discussing his non-profit "KIMB"), Nate Silver, Tim Urban (Wait But Why), and Antonio García Martínez.
  • Logistics and Tone: The event emphasizes that all proceeds go back into the event, with no profit for hosts; a significant portion of the budget is allocated to gift bags (reported at ~$400k) and high-profile entertainment (potential bookings include Drake or Dua Lipa for seven figures).