Panel
Inequality and Mobility in America
Consensus on Trends and Causes
- Income and wealth inequality in the United States has risen significantly for decades, particularly since the late 1970s.
- Conventional economic drivers identified for this trend include globalization (increasing labor supply competition) and technology (creating an educational premium for high-skilled workers).
- Jared Bernstein argues that structural policy shifts post-mid-1970s, specifically "slacker" labor markets (unemployment at or below full employment dropping from 70% to 30% of the time), were more critical than technology alone.
- Bernstein cites financialization and the rise of "super managers" as major factors, noting top salaries account for two-thirds of the income growth in the top 10%.
- Edward Conard attributes high top wages to a global shortage of properly trained IT talent, asserting that CEO pay has not risen disproportionately relative to the 0.1% top earners or shareholders.
- Conard contends that a massive increase in labor supply (Baby Boom, female labor participation, and immigration) has exerted downward pressure on middle-income wages, independent of top-end growth.
- Chrystia Freeland emphasizes that while economic drivers may be fundamental, the societal and democratic consequences of extreme inequality pose an existential political challenge.
Disputed Economic Data and Interpretations
- Bernstein asserts that median and low-income real wages have been flat or falling in the US since 2000, contrasting with stronger growth in Germany and France during similar periods.
- Conard disputes the "flat wage" narrative, arguing that US median income growth is comparable to France and Germany since 1980, with recent stagnation being a global phenomenon post-2000.
- Bernstein refutes the "trickle-down" hypothesis, stating that periods of lower inequality (mid-1940s to mid-1970s) featured faster GDP growth, productivity gains, and lower unemployment than the high-inequality era.
- Conard argues that the US economy has outperformed Europe and Japan in employment growth (up 50% since 1980) and work hours per adult (20-25% higher), validating the success of its high-inequality model in creating jobs.
- Bernstein counters that while US capital share has grown, the 99% in Germany and Japan still captures a similar share of GDP as the US, suggesting the US 1% gain comes from capital shifting rather than total growth.
- Conard maintains that restricting labor supply to raise wages would damage the innovation engine that drives the US's high-wage economy relative to the world.
Social, Cultural, and Mobility Factors
- Robert Doerr identifies family structure as a critical determinant of poverty, noting that children in single-parent families face significantly higher challenges in success.
- Doerr argues that government support programs (e.g., Earned Income Tax Credit, welfare) effectively supplement low wages, making the combination of work and support superior to no work.
- Chrystia Freeland highlights an "educational arms race," where the top quintile spends $7,000 more per child annually on enrichment, widening the gap in starting-line opportunities.
- Studies by Raj Chetty indicate that relative mobility (the probability of moving from the bottom 20% to the top 20%) has remained flat despite rising inequality.
- Conard notes that absolute mobility has increased due to higher overall income levels, even if relative mobility rates remain stagnant.
- Freeland and Bernstein agree that rising inequality necessitates higher rates of mobility to maintain the "fair game" perception and social stability.
- The panel notes a widespread public perception that the economic game is rigged, evidenced by anti-business political shifts and the popularity of inequality-focused literature like Thomas Piketty's.
Proposed Solutions and Policy Directions
- Labor and Trade Policy: Conard proposes balancing trade by reducing the $500 billion annual non-energy deficit, which he argues exports millions of jobs and suppresses middle-class wages.
- Immigration Reform: Conard advocates for decoupling high-skilled immigration (H-1B visas) from unskilled immigration to import global talent while addressing labor shortages.
- Full Employment Strategy: Bernstein calls for a "full employment" agenda to drive quality job creation, including union power, higher minimum wages, and lowering trade deficits.
- Corporate Governance: Freeland suggests businesses adopt "inclusive capitalism," urging executives to prioritize stakeholder interests and job security alongside shareholder value.
- Family and Incentive Structures: The panel stresses the need to address the negative economic consequences of non-two-parent households and reform welfare programs that may inadvertently discourage work (e.g., benefit cliffs under the ACA).
- Safety Nets: Freeland supports universal healthcare and robust social safety nets to buffer citizens against the volatility of the modern economy, acknowledging that "creative destruction" hurts low-income workers disproportionately.
- Talent Cultivation: Conard argues for a moral and economic obligation to incentivize training in high-demand fields (e.g., computer programming) through current pay structures and by increasing access to global talent pools.