Conference Presentation, Panel
Investing With Impact in Underserved Small Businesses
Milken InstituteAron Betru, Maria Contreras-Sweet, Kimberlee Cornett, Annie Donovan, John Lettieri, Kim Saunders, Aaron Better
Context and Demographics
- Median household wealth in the African American community dropped by 75% between 1983 and 2013, with recovery to non-minority levels estimated to take 200 years.
- Median household wealth in the Hispanic American community dropped by 50% over the same period, with an estimated 80-year recovery timeline.
- Concentration of capital is heavily skewed, with 25 zip codes holding the majority of capital, while African Americans and Latinos receive only 1% of available capital despite women receiving up to 46%.
- The National Community Investment Fund (NCIF) and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) identify Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) and Minority Depository Institutions (MDIs) as the only financial sector entities consistently operating in both high deposit and high lending intensity in low-income neighborhoods.
Institutional Roles and Interventions
- The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) reported a 23% increase in loans to women and a 70% increase in loans to African Americans during Maria Contreras-Sweet's tenure as Administrator.
- Post-2008 banking regulations and the retraction of community banking sectors created "banking deserts," forcing underserved borrowers to rely on friends, family, or high-interest credit cards (the second line of capital for minority communities) rather than traditional bank loans.
- CDFIs and MDIs serve a unique role by providing specialized "hand-holding" services, including technical assistance, business plan development, and trust-building, which correlate with loan success rates comparable to or higher than mainstream banks despite serving high-risk demographics.
- The Kresge Foundation is developing the first domestic multi-investor guarantee facility to activate guarantees as a capital-efficient tool to address gaps caused by lack of track record, sporadic cash flow, and low collateral among small businesses.
- The SBA utilizes the "Ban the Box" movement concept to reduce bias for felons seeking microloans, though concerns were raised about the potential dismantling of the CRA (Community Reinvestment Act) and related support structures.
Policy Mechanisms and Incentives
- The "Investing in Opportunity Act" created Opportunity Zones, leveraging over $6 trillion in unrealized capital gains (as of 2017) by offering tax-deferred incentives for investors to roll gains into qualified funds for low-income communities.
- Opportunity Zones allow state governors to designate up to 25% of low-income census tracts within their states, creating a flexible, non-capped pool of capital for real estate, business investment, and green energy.
- Unlike the New Markets Tax Credit, the Opportunity Zone program relies on private investor capital rather than fixed federal allocations, theoretically allowing scale to increase with investor interest.
- The Treasury Department and OCC are currently engaging in a public comment process via an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) to refine CRA assessment areas, particularly regarding fintech players without physical footprints.
- SBA loan guarantees cover two-thirds of the loan amount, effectively de-risking the transaction for commercial banks and encouraging lending to businesses that might otherwise be deemed too risky.
Risks, Challenges, and Future Outlook
- Panelists expressed concern that the Opportunity Zone program could become overly focused on real estate investment rather than small business creation if not properly guided by community financial institutions.
- There is a fear that softening CRA rules could undermine the pipeline of capital for underserved communities, necessitating a "two steps forward, one step back" caution.
- Failure to address capital gaps in the bottom 20% of the population (who saw zero job growth during the post-recession recovery) is projected to result in a loss of 9 million net jobs compared to a baseline scenario, hindering national demand and prosperity.
- Success in mobilizing capital for underserved communities is framed as critical to maintaining U.S. global leadership, as it reinforces democratic values and the "American Dream" narrative that competitors like China and Russia are actively challenging.
- The panel concluded that getting this right unlocks the potential of "left behind" talent, creating a healthier, more robust market and ensuring the U.S. remains a preeminent peacekeeper and economic leader.