Conference Presentation, Panel
Lessons Learned: Market Volatility and Opportunities Ahead
Milken InstituteMichael Piwowar, Stephen Berger, Jeffrey T. Dinwoodie, Darrell Duffie, Barbara Novick, Mike Divivar
Market Volatility Metrics (February–March 2020):
- Dow Jones and NASDAQ fell more than 30%.
- VIX volatility index surged from below 20 to over 80, the highest level since the 2008 crisis.
- Market-wide circuit breakers triggered four times in March, previously tripping only once since 1987.
- West Texas Intermediate crude oil futures collapsed from $18 to negative $37 per barrel in April.
Comparative Crisis Analysis:
- Daryl Duffy (Stanford): Characterized the 2008 crisis as a credit crisis originating in the financial system, whereas the pandemic was a real economy shock (healthcare, unemployment) propagating into the financial system.
- Barbara Novick (BlackRock): Noted 2008 involved poor underwriting, excessive leverage, and fraud; the pandemic had no financial system root cause but triggered a massive "dash for cash" due to uncertainty.
- Systemic Difference: Banks were resilient amplifiers in 2008 but "safe" and non-expansive in 2020 due to post-2008 regulations, causing bond markets (especially Treasuries) to become dysfunctional rather than liquid.
Impact of Post-2008 Reforms:
- OTC Derivatives: Central clearing, real-time reporting, and electronic trading venues (e.g., Bloomberg, TradeWeb) improved resilience; $75 trillion in interest rate swaps were cleared in March alone with zero counterparty risk failures.
- Banking Sector: Large U.S. banks entered 2020 with significantly stronger balance sheets due to capital buffers and stress testing, preventing systemic collapse driven by banks.
- Operational Resiliency: Mandatory clearing, enhanced supervisory standards (SEC Reg SCI, CFTC), and updated circuit breakers ("Limit Up-Limit Down") ensured market plumbing functioned during the crisis.
- Regulatory Coordination: The Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) and inter-agency working groups facilitated unprecedented real-time communication between the Fed, Treasury, and SEC.
Identified Market Structure Deficiencies:
- Treasury Market: The $20 trillion market lacks real-time public reporting, central clearing, and "all-to-all" trading capabilities, making it unable to absorb massive liquidity shocks without Federal Reserve intervention.
- Commercial Paper: Currently operates via "parallel monopolies" tied to specific banks; lacks central clearing, limiting liquidity access during stress.
- Bond ETFs: Contrary to some narratives, ETFs acted as liquidity providers and price discovery tools, offering efficient bid-ask spreads when underlying OTC bond markets were frozen.
- Swing Pricing: While legally permitted for U.S. mutual funds, the lack of a regulatory mandate to operationalize "swing pricing" prevents funds from passing transaction costs to transacting investors, creating dilution for remaining shareholders.
- Liquidity Risk Management: The 30% liquidity test in funds creates uncertainty when coupled with mandatory board meetings; panelists suggest decoupling these features to prevent panic.
Federal Reserve Intervention and Moral Hazard:
- Scope: The Fed utilized a 2008-style playbook, opening facilities for commercial paper, asset-backed securities, corporate bonds, and municipal bonds.
- Daryl Duffy's Warning: Reliance on Fed rescues without market structure fixes creates moral hazard, encouraging excessive risk-taking and stunting investment in private market infrastructure.
- Price Discovery Risk: Extensive Fed buying distorts fundamental yield curves, reducing market transparency.
- Future Dependency: As the Treasury market grows, current structures may require increasingly frequent Fed intervention unless modernized.
Regulatory Actions and Proposals:
- SEC Proposal: Aims to apply Reg ATS and SEC Reg SCI requirements to platforms trading only government securities, addressing conflicts of interest and system integrity.
- Treasury Reporting: FINRA's TRACE for Treasuries data is collected but not yet disseminated to the public; panelists advocate for immediate public release to remove information asymmetries.
- Retail Investing: Increased direct retail trading is viewed positively for democratization, but regulators must scrutinize sales practices, payment-for-order flow arrangements, and potential collateral consequences on market stability.
Forward-Looking Recommendations (Next 3–6 Months):
- Daryl Duffy: Conduct a serious quantitative study on whether current market structure can handle growing bond market liquidity demands; prioritize price transparency rollout.
- Stephen Berger: Focus on implementing post-trade consolidated tapes for global bond and derivatives markets (including Europe's MIFID II gaps) and Treasury transparency.
- Barbara Novick: Adopt a holistic approach based on data rather than single fixes; prioritize decoupling liquidity tests, enabling swing pricing, and developing central clearing for commercial paper.
- Jeff Dinwoody: Maintain focus on cybersecurity threats and continue comprehensive reforms of the housing finance system.