newsfilter.io
Fireside Chat, Interview

Roger Ehrenberg: Why VC Returns Will Get Worse & Why LP Incentive Structures are so Broken | E1117

  • Industry Structure & Commoditization:

    • Venture capital will never be fully commoditized, though mid and late-stage segments may evolve into institutional asset management.
    • Incubation, pre-seed, and seed stages will remain distinct, "artisanal" activities that cannot be scaled or commoditized.
    • The industry is polarizing into "barbell" structures: large, multi-stage corporate platforms on one side and boutique early-stage firms on the other.
    • Large asset gatherers (corporations, sovereigns) require "grand slam" exits to justify their massive capital bases, necessitating a farm system of boutique early-stage investors.
    • Fee compression is expected in mid/late-stage venture due to an oversupply of capital, while top-tier early-stage firms will command premium fees due to superior performance.
    • The 2 and 20 fee model faces pressure, particularly as new LP classes (sovereigns, family offices) demand fairer fees and higher after-fee returns.
    • Top performers like Sequoia and Renaissance Tech will maintain premium fee structures because their after-fee returns continue to outperform.
    • Hedge fund-style share classes with varying lockups and fees are unlikely to succeed in VC due to the asset class's inherent long-duration liquidity constraints.
  • Liquidity & Capital Dynamics:

    • The liquidity environment has fundamentally shifted due to new LP classes (sovereign wealth funds, multi-billion dollar family offices) that are not major players in previous cycles.
    • This influx of capital creates return compression; without proportional exit outcomes, aggregate returns dilute across a larger asset base.
    • Continuation funds are identified as the primary intermediate liquidity mechanism for LPs seeking exits during periods of closed IPO/M&A markets.
    • Continuation funds allow existing portfolios to be priced at net-new valuations, offering an off-ramp for antsy LPs while providing fresh capital to managers.
    • Effective recycling of capital through small M&A (e.g., $50–$70M deals) is largely extinct, creating significant pressure on early-stage fund liquidity.
    • IPO markets are not expected to reopen significantly until 2025 at the earliest, with a full recovery anticipated by 2026.
    • The author anticipates M&A activity will expand if regulatory environments shift (e.g., potential changes to the FTC under different administrations).
  • Investment Strategy & Timing:

    • The author observes a cyclical pattern of "seismic shifts" in markets roughly every 17 years.
    • Current market conditions mirror the peak preceding a downturn, characterized by "too easy" money and a feeling that the industry is overheated.
    • A correlation exists where it is "hard to invest when it is easy to fundraise" and vice versa.
    • The author advises avoiding "pure AI" investments due to hype cycles, preferring to seek opportunities in sectors receiving less attention despite having massive potential.
    • Successful exits require a two-year preparation lead time for IPO readiness, including legal, compliance, and board restructuring.
    • Early-stage investors should sell small percentages of positions during peaks to "get blood from a stone" and mitigate downside risk, rather than holding for full liquidity if the market is distant from public readiness.
    • Distribution of shares post-IPO should be systematic for later exits (DataDog, Wise) but rapid for franchise-making "first IPOs" (TradeDesk) to secure returns before potential market corrections.
    • Endowments are advised to allocate only 5-7% to venture alternatives to manage liquidity profiles while still capturing convexity, provided they can select top-tier managers.
  • LP Landscape & Incentives:

    • Traditional LP structures (endowments) are described as "broken" due to misaligned incentives where CIOs prioritize not getting fired over long-term performance.
    • Sovereigns and large family offices are "fair weather" less likely than corporations, as they have inexorable capital deployment needs and focus on long-term after-fee returns.
    • Endowment culture is driven by mission and intellectual environment rather than pure profit maximization.
    • Fee structures in endowments are less critical than the opportunity for young talent to learn and build relationships.
    • The rise of institutional, late-stage firms makes it easier to deploy capital at 12-15% risk-adjusted returns, which is sufficient for large LP portfolios despite lower multiples than early-stage boutique funds.
  • Personal Narrative & Psychology:

    • The author left Wall Street due to a corrosive culture where the "pie is big," politics were sharp, and the learning curve had stopped.
    • Three major "needle-moving" moments in wealth perception were a $320k bonus at Citi, a $6M+ special equity grant at Deutsche Bank, and the successful IPO of TradeDesk.
    • Wealth accumulation has not increased the author's drive; motivation now stems from work ethic, ego, and the desire to build rather than economic necessity.
    • Success in venture remains cyclical and does not eliminate the need for daily hustle; reputation must be earned continuously.
    • Parenting in wealth abundance requires constant vigilance to ensure children remain ambitious and grounded, achieved through "walking the talk" rather than just verbal instruction.
    • The author identifies "picking your battles" and rejecting the "winning vs. losing" mindset as the core secrets to a 37-year successful marriage.
  • Future Outlook:

    • The author expects to transition to a chairperson role in 10 years, with his sons serving as principal operators of the family business.
    • Future focus will shift to real estate, affordable workforce housing, and economic rejuvenation in Detroit and the Great Lakes states.
    • The author advises future managers to be "shocking" and avoid playing it safe, emphasizing the need for deeply held theses.
    • The best founders do not need VCs but benefit immensely from empathetic, stable partners who provide psychological support during the early struggle for product-market fit.