Panel, Conference Presentation
The Blockchain: A Revolution You Need to Understand
Milken InstituteMarc Hochstein, Brian Forde, Jalak Jobanputra, Leanne Kemp, Margaret Liu, Steve Wager
Panelist Introduction & Expertise
- Brian Forde (MIT Media Lab): Leads one of the world's largest academic cryptocurrency research initiatives, staffed by 10–15 personnel and 40 graduate students.
- Jalik Jobintra (Future Perfect Ventures): Manages an early-stage NY venture fund with 10 portfolio companies in the blockchain sector; compares the current market to early internet investing.
- Leanne Kemp (Everledger): Founder/CEO of a London-based startup digitizing diamonds on the blockchain to reduce fraud in insurance and supply chains.
- Margaret Liu (Conference of State Bank Supervisors): Washington-based policy group for state banking regulators focusing on virtual currency risks and fintech innovation.
- Steve Wager (ItBitTrust): Product head for a fintech/financial services hybrid delivering T0 (instant) settlements and new collateral frameworks for securities and commodities.
Core Technology & Value Proposition
- Friction Reduction: Bitcoin/blockchain enables open, interoperable peer-to-peer transactions (similar to email), bypassing the complex, fee-heavy, and slow verification steps required by traditional banks and payment processors.
- Ownership & Immutability: The technology creates a decentralized ledger where assets (digital or physical) are truly owned by the user, cannot be reversed without consensus, and are immune to corporate cancellation (e.g., StubHub ticket seizures).
- Rivalrous Digital Assets: Blockchain converts non-rivalrous digital goods (e.g., e-books, music) into rivalrous assets, enabling resale and true ownership unlike current "lifetime lease" models.
- Scalability Potential: Just as email exponentially increased communication, blockchain aims to exponentially increase the volume of global transactions.
Regulatory Landscape & Risk Management
- Regulatory Evolution: Regulators initially viewed pseudonymity and open networks as "unspeakable sins" but are now engaging in "RegTech" dialogues to leverage blockchain for compliance.
- Consumer Protection: State regulators prioritize consumer awareness regarding the lack of FDIC insurance, fraud risks, and the finality of transactions (no chargebacks).
- AML/KYC Challenges: The pseudonymous nature of public blockchains complicates Know Your Customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) mandates, requiring a balance between privacy and legal reporting obligations.
- RegTech Opportunity: Permissioned blockchains allow regulators to access transaction data in real-time ("see all data"), standardizing trade reporting and audit processes through a push mechanism.
Market Structure & Infrastructure
- Permissioned vs. Permissionless:
- Public (Permissionless): Like Bitcoin; open to all validators; requires native tokens to incentivize miners; highly secure but lacks recourse for fraud.
- Private (Permissioned): Requires KYC/compliance; participants have legal agreements; allows for regulatory visibility and fraud recourse.
- Financial Industry Rationale: Banks face capital constraints from Basel III and Dodd-Frank; blockchain enables T0 settlement and bilateral gross settlement, potentially cutting compliance and operational costs by 30–50%.
- Legacy System Obsolescence: Current clearing systems (e.g., NSCC, DTC) rely on COBOL infrastructure from 40+ years ago; blockchain offers a path to replace central counterparties with automated, bilateral risk management.
- Risk Shift: Moving to bilateral settlement removes the central counterparty guarantee, pushing risk to individual entities but mitigating it with 100% pre-transaction verification of positions and funds.
- Permissioned vs. Permissionless:
Specific Use Cases
- Diamond Industry (Everledger):
- Digitizes 1 million diamonds annually by recording 40 metadata points and inclusions to create a unique "fingerprint."
- Addresses fraud from synthetic stones (passing as natural) and double-financing of inventory.
- Utilizes a hybrid model: Public ledger for transparency and private consortium for sensitive Kimberley Process certification.
- Global Identity & Financial Inclusion:
- Aims to provide identity for 3 billion unbanked people and refugees, enabling access to government services and credit via biometric authentication on the blockchain.
- Reduces KYC costs (>$10 billion annually) by allowing identity verification once to be shared across institutions.
- Internet of Things (IoT):
- Facilitates microtransactions and data sharing between 25+ billion sensors (e.g., real-time solar energy trading).
- Enables machine-to-machine data exchange previously siloed due to trust and transaction cost issues.
- Diamond Industry (Everledger):
Energy & Environmental Concerns
- Mining Mechanics: Bitcoin "mining" is a proof-of-work process where global compute power secures the network; it consumes energy comparable to major tech firms but provides immunity against ledger tampering.
- Environmental Mitigation: Mining firms are financially incentivized to use cheap/renewable energy (e.g., solar) to reduce operating costs; cooling efficiency is also a key focus.
- Scale Comparison: A scaled Bitcoin network could theoretically consume energy equivalent to a medium-sized country (e.g., Ireland), necessitating a shift toward sustainable energy sources.
Future Outlook & Projections
- Timeline: 2015 was the "year of education"; 2016 is the "year of proof of concept"; 2017 is projected for specific use cases (e.g., commodities, share issuance) to move into production.
- Ecosystem Evolution: No single "blockchain to rule them all"; instead, a landscape of specialized chains for specific asset classes with future interoperability standards (e.g., R3) allowing tokens to hop between chains.
- Smart Contracts: Ethereum and similar platforms enable automated contract execution (e.g., bets, insurance) without intermediaries, increasing efficiency for micro-transactions.
- Collaboration: Regulators are expressing openness to working with industry to integrate blockchain into the regulated financial system rather than opposing it.
Technical Clarifications
- Native Tokens: Public blockchains require a native currency to incentivize miners and facilitate transfer; private blockchains often forgo this, relying on participant consensus and legal agreements.
- Terminology: KYC (Know Your Customer) and DTC (Depository Trust Company) are standard industry terms; the latter currently holds $6.3 billion in capital against clearing activity.
- Identity Privacy: Blockchain identity does not expose personal data publicly; instead, it uses cryptographic authentication (e.g., biometrics) to allow users to grant permission for specific data access (e.g., health records).