Panel, Conference Presentation
The Forces Shaping Europe
The UK EU Referendum (Brexit)
- Polling Volatility: Pre-referendum polls show inconsistent results, with estimates ranging from 43% to 46% supporting leaving the EU and 38% to 45% supporting remaining.
- Economic Sovereignty Arguments (Howard Shaw):
- Cites the loss of legislative control, arguing the European Court of Justice supersedes the UK Supreme Court.
- States the UK subsidizes the EU by approximately £8–10 billion annually.
- Claims 60% of all UK regulations originate from the EU.
- Argues that EU-imposed regulations disproportionately harm small businesses and entrepreneurs compared to large FTSE corporations.
- Immigration and Labor Market Dynamics:
- Highlights the inability to control net migration due to EU free movement laws, noting the UK has created more jobs than the rest of the EU combined in the past five years.
- Points out that the UK government's immigration targets are consistently missed due to EU entitlements.
- Notes a "brain drain" where high-skilled graduates from top UK universities are forced to leave due to immigration caps, while low-wage EU migrants access free healthcare and housing benefits.
- Eurozone Economic Critique (Jim Mellon):
- Identifies the single currency as Europe's "worst project," causing massive economic distortions.
- Notes that Germany's currency is estimated to be 18% undervalued, allowing it to run trade surpluses of 7.5% to 8% of GDP, effectively "exporting unemployment" to other members.
- Predicts a "monumental crisis" and potential disintegration of the Eurozone within 3 to 5 years due to debt traps in France and Italy and the failure of a one-size-fits-all monetary policy.
- Argues Britain is better positioned "in a lifeboat" outside the Eurozone than on the "Euro Titanic."
- Political and Legal Integration (Peter Baer):
- Maintains that the EU was founded as a political project to prevent future wars, making the referendum "dangerous" for both the UK and the EU.
- Defends the European Court of Justice as a necessary legal framework comparable to the US Supreme Court.
- Cites an OECD study suggesting Brexit would cost every English citizen approximately €3,000 annually.
- Warns that leaving without a comprehensive reform plan ignores the need for a federal European treasury to fix the single currency.
Migration, Nationalism, and Regional Instability
- Rise of Populism:
- Right-wing nationalist parties are gaining strength across Europe, including the AfD in Germany, Front National in France, and movements in Poland, Belgium, and Austria.
- Drivers include the refugee crisis, globalization backlash, and economic underperformance.
- Refugee Crisis Management:
- Germany accepted over 1 million migrants in the preceding year, facing unpreparedness from both the national government and the international community.
- Peter Baer notes a lack of solidarity among EU member states, with few countries supporting the proposed allocation of migrants relative to population and economic strength.
- Paul Wolfowitz characterizes the refugee situation as a form of "weaponization" and a global security issue requiring intervention at the source (e.g., in Syria and Iraq).
- Foreign Policy Failures:
- Panelists attribute the refugee crisis to US and Western policy failures in the Middle East, specifically the removal of President Mubarak and the lack of decisive action against Bashar al-Assad.
- Senator Roger Wicker and Paul Wolfowitz argue that the current administration's failure to stop "barrel bombing" in Syria is a primary driver of civilian casualties and displacement.
Geopolitics and Security (Russia, Ukraine, and Energy)
- Russian Aggression:
- Paul Wolfowitz describes Vladimir Putin's actions in Ukraine as "getting away with murder," posing risks to NATO members with Russian minorities, such as Lithuania.
- Senator Wicker identifies the potential conflict in Ukraine as the most significant threat to Europe, outweighing the Brexit vote in importance.
- Wicker argues the West must support Ukraine's integration with the EU and West to counter Putin's influence in Georgia, Transnistria, and the Baltic region.
- Energy Dependency:
- Germany relies on Russia for approximately one-third of its gas and oil imports; former Yugoslav states are often up to 100% dependent.
- Russia uses energy leverage to exert political pressure, such as offering economic deals to Serbia while the EU imposes sanctions.
- Efforts are underway to diversify energy sources through LNG imports from Canada and the US, though infrastructure like terminals remains a bottleneck.
- Security Architecture:
- Paul Wolfowitz asserts that NATO, not the EU, is the primary institution for European security and that the EU has failed to substitute for it.
- Wolfowitz urges NATO nations to meet the 2% GDP defense spending commitment and provides better weaponry to Ukraine to impose costs on Russia.
Trade, Regulation, and Globalization
- Trade Barriers and Tariffs:
- The EU imposes tariffs on non-EU imports, including 50% on dairy from New Zealand/Australia and 28% on cereals from the US, increasing the cost of living for British households by approximately 10%.
- Jim Mellon disputes the notion that Brexit would end UK-EU trade, arguing that interdependence makes it economically irrational for the EU to impose harsh terms on the UK.
- Regulatory Disputes:
- Howard Shaw cites the EU regulation of vacuum cleaner efficiency as an example of protectionism favoring German competitors (e.g., Miele) over UK innovators (e.g., James Dyson).
- Howard Shaw notes a trade deficit of £30–40 billion with Germany and argues the EU would not withdraw access to the single market given the high cost to Europe.
- TTIP and Globalization:
- Concerns exist regarding the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), with environmental groups alleging it weakens consumer protections.
- Peter Baer views TTIP as a geostrategic necessity despite negotiation leaks, while acknowledging the political difficulty of explaining complex globalization to the public.
- Historical Context:
- The EU originated from the European Coal and Steel Community, designed to pool resources to prevent war between France and Germany.
- Jim Mellon notes that Britain joined in 1973 as a free trade zone, not a political union, and was previously rejected twice by de Gaulle due to the Common Agricultural Policy.
- Peter Baer observes that out of 262 treaties governing EU trade, roughly 250 favor continental Europe while only 12 favor Britain.
Future Outlook and Decisions
- Federalism Requirement:
- Peter Baer concludes that preventing Eurozone collapse requires a federal Europe with a central treasury, a shift that would require transferring sovereignty from national parliaments to Brussels.
- Jim Mellon predicts a future split of the Eurozone into multiple economic blocks or total disintegration within 3–5 years.
- Brexit Viability:
- Panelists disagree on the likelihood of a successful withdrawal; Jim Mellon believes the vote will happen but the economic fallout is manageable, whereas Peter Baer fears a "punitive" response from the EU if the UK leaves.
- Howard Shaw suggests that if the UK leaves, it must immediately deregulate to capitalize on the opportunity to out-compete the EU.
- US Role:
- Paul Wolfowitz states that the US views Brexit as a lower-priority issue compared to Ukraine, Russia, and the refugee crisis.
- Wicker and Wolfowitz emphasize that the US prefers a strong UK within NATO as a bridge between America and Europe.