Interview
Will Cursor Kill Figma? Lightspeed Raises $9B & OpenAI’s $1B from Disney & #1 App in App Store
Lightspeed Ventures raised $9 billion across six funds, redefining the venture landscape:
- Approximately $2 billion is allocated to venture/early-stage funds, while $7 billion targets growth vehicles.
- The fund targets "mega exits" to justify the capital, relying on wins like Databricks (15x return), Coinbase (5x), and late-stage concentration in Entropic ($200M investment).
- This scale creates a "barbell" dynamic where seed economics become less critical, as multi-stage managers can absorb early losses to secure access to later-stage rounds.
- The $9 billion raise, combined with Dragoneer's $4.3 billion fund, signals over $13 billion in new capital for late-stage growth, intensifying competition.
The Private Market "Super Cycle" is driven by a lack of IPOs, keeping top-tier growth companies private:
- The delay in IPOs for companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Databricks has allowed venture capital to compound value internally rather than transferring it to public markets.
- Investors can achieve massive IRRs (e.g., 70% for SpaceX investors since 2010) that were unavailable in the public sector.
- The "winning play" is betting on growth super-cycles; companies like SpaceX are valued on "Elon Option Value" (EOV) rather than traditional financial metrics, justifying a potential $1.5 trillion valuation.
- Public markets previously protected retail investors from bad IPOs, but this has inadvertently left massive compounding value with private investors.
OpenAI and Enterprise AI Dynamics show shifting competitive landscapes:
- Valuation & Funding: OpenAI is rumored to target a $600–800 billion valuation in a secondary round, with a potential $1.5 trillion IPO; Disney invested $1 billion for equity and a cross-licensing deal to use its IP in AI image generation.
- Growth Metrics: ChatGPT was the most downloaded app in the US in 2025, but user growth has slowed to single digits, raising concerns about the "high growth bet" slowing down and forcing a re-rating from growth to cash flow.
- Competitive Threat: Anthropic's move into an AI coding tool for designers is seen as a potential threat to Figma, highlighting a trend of category convergence.
- Infrastructure: End-users are currently spending ~$15–16 billion on AI apps, while infrastructure spend is ~$400 billion; the market must grow 10x to make the capex investment sustainable.
Public Market Corrections & Sector Risks indicate volatility in AI hardware and software:
- Oracle: Shares dropped 15% (45% from highs) following earnings that highlighted massive $12 billion capex spending dedicated to OpenAI, signaling a shift to a capital-intensive, lower-margin business model.
- CoreWeave: Down 60% from July highs, identified as a high-risk, marginal player in the AI infrastructure space with no proprietary IP to diversify risk.
- Broadcom: Lost $300 billion in market cap in 48 hours due to concerns that a $21 billion Anthropic order would compress gross margins by offering non-standard chips at lower prices than NVIDIA.
- Market Valuation: The S&P 500 sits at PE peaks comparable to 2000 and 2021; Apollo Global Management forecasts zero 10-year returns for public equities at current entry prices.
Category Convergence in AI Software is reshaping the competitive map:
- Coding & Design: Tools like Cursor (coding) and Figma (design) are converging, with AI enabling "vibe coding" where design and production merge into a single agent workflow.
- Enterprise Impact: 55% of enterprise AI spend is currently in coding/development; this is expected to remain the epicenter of value creation.
- "Maiming" vs. "Killing": AI leaders may not kill incumbents outright but "maim" them by reducing Net Revenue Retention (NRR) as customers use AI to do more with fewer seats (e.g., UiPath, GitLab, Mongo).
- Strategic Shift: Incumbents like UiPath and Salesforce must pivot to "agentic" products to restore 30%+ growth rates, or risk permanent valuation compression.
High-Risk Entrepreneurial Ventures highlight the extremes of AI investment:
- Boom Supersonic: Raised $300 million from Crusoe to build supersonic planes and data-center-grade jet engines; the company pivoted from a failed private round to a $1.5 billion valuation, betting on dual-use engine technology.
- SpaceX IPO: Rumored for a $1.5 trillion valuation driven by Starlink growth and the "Elon Option Value" of his track record with PayPal, Tesla, SpaceX, and OpenAI.
- Investor Sentiment: Founders Fund and Google (10% stake) are poised to benefit from the SpaceX IPO; Peter Thiel's past kindness to Elon Musk (accelerating stock vesting) is cited as a strategic move paying off.
- Market Selection: Investors are increasingly favoring "pure plays" like Anthropic over OpenAI, betting on Anthropic's path to profitability and sensible governance.
Talent & Operational Shifts reflect the intensity of the AI race:
- Vesting Cliff Removal: Startups are eliminating the standard 1-year vesting cliff to compete for talent in a market where equity grants are worth millions; this creates "mercenary" employees who can leave without penalty.
- CEO Will: Leaders like UiPath's Daniel Dines are being tested on their ability to "refound" their companies for the AI era, requiring 18–24 months to deploy high-ROI agentic products.
- Capital Allocation: The market is filtering for companies with clear plans (Google, Microsoft, OpenAI) while rejecting marginal players lacking distinct strategies (CoreWeave, Oracle AI division).