Latest Interviews
Showing 1–3 of 3 transcripts.
Clear all filters- The Economist20 min
Legally bombed: Trump cases dropped
Trump, Rosie Bloor, Adam O'Neill, Dina Musa, Andrew Palmer
Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to dismiss two federal cases against former President Donald Trump, citing presidential immunity and the constitutional policy barring the prosecution of sitting presidents, while Trump simultaneously declared a 25% tariff on Canadian and Mexican imports. Concurrently, a New York court found Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts regarding hush money payments, though sentencing was indefinitely postponed to prevent the conviction of an active president. Legal analysts note that while these federal cases can be refiled depending on future political control, Trump and his allies view the dismissals as a definitive victory against politically motivated prosecutions.
- Goldman Sachs18 min
What Trump’s policies could mean for the Fed
Trump, Rob Kaplan, Alison Nathan
In a November 11, 2024 discussion, former Dallas Fed President Rob Kaplan and Goldman Sachs' Alison Nathan evaluate the Federal Reserve's successful "soft landing" execution while highlighting significant purchasing power erosion for the lower 65 million workers. Kaplan predicts distinct regulatory shifts under the new administration and warns that structural factors like labor contraction and potential deregulation will complicate future inflation and growth trajectories. Consequently, he advises markets to treat the anticipated December rate cut as a conditional "game-time decision" pending clearer data on labor dynamics and the administration's fiscal strategy.
- The Economist15 min
How Trump is still damaging American politics
Trump, John Priddoe, Tudor Dixon
Following the 2020 election, Donald Trump's rejection of the results triggered political violence, widespread harassment of election officials, and a shift within the Republican Party where truth-tellers face expulsion while Trump allies actively recruit election deniers for state-level offices. Concurrently, 52 voting restriction laws enacted in 2021 and 2022 have narrowed access to voting under unsubstantiated fraud claims, creating systemic vulnerabilities for the 2024 presidential election. Experts warn that these combined forces of anti-democratic rhetoric, legislative interference, and a polarized party apparatus pose an existential threat to the certification of future elections and the stability of the American federal system.