newsfilter.io

Latest Interviews

Showing 1–4 of 4 transcripts.

Clear all filters
  1. All-In Podcast1h 39m

    Mag 7 sell-off, Wiz rejects Google, UBI, Kamala in, China's nuclear buildout, Sacks responds to PG

    Kamala, Sacks, PG, Nostracanis, Wiz, Sam Altman, Rupert Murdoch, Biden, Josh Shapiro

    Wiz rejected a $23 billion acquisition offer from Google to pursue an IPO, a strategic move that underscores growing demand for cloud security following the CrowdStrike global outage and highlights the critical role of Alphabet's $40 billion run-rate cloud division amid antitrust scrutiny. The event also examined broader market volatility driven by AI stock rotations and geopolitical shocks, while analyzing a failed UBI experiment in Texas and Illinois that challenged the economic necessity of universal basic income. Finally, the discussion covered high-stakes developments including Rupert Murdoch's succession struggle within News Corp, the swift U.S. presidential nomination shift to Kamala Harris, and urgent warnings regarding U.S. nuclear energy deficits relative to China's aggressive infrastructure expansion.

  2. All-In Podcast1h 24m

    E122: Is AI the next great computing platform? ChatGPT vs. Google, containing AGI & RESTRICT Act

    Joe Manchin, Biden, Sacks, Friedberg, J Cal, Mark, Jake, Nick, Chamath Palihapitiya, David, Sax, John Greenewald, Zach

    Senator Joe Manchin's op-ed criticizing the Inflation Reduction Act sparked speculation of a presidential run, while Ron Lauder's shift in donor support signaled volatility within the Republican primary. Concurrently, OpenAI's launch of a plugin ecosystem enabled ChatGPT to bypass traditional app navigation, driving its user base to 100 million in two months and challenging tech giants like Google and Microsoft. However, this rapid AI advancement precipitated debates over job displacement in white-collar sectors and ethical concerns regarding recursive self-improvement, even as lawmakers pushed the "Restrict Act" to ban TikTok with penalties critics argue threaten internet privacy and freedom.

  3. All-In Podcast1h 26m

    E38: Bestie brawl, Robinhood's $70M fine & S-1, Delta variant, next gen candidates & more

    Jason, Sacks, Robinhood, GPs, Trump, Dems, Lina Khan, Sha'Carri Richardson, Kamala Harris, DeSantis, Judge, Amazon, Facebook, CNN, Google, Politico, CNBC, NYT, Twitter, FINRA, SEC, FTC, Olympic, Republican, Democratic, Chamath, Calacanis, Friedberg, Maggie, Trvrb

    Jason Calacanis and his All In podcast co-hosts resolved a public feud over moderation airtime by unblocking David Sacks and refocusing on the show's content amidst a broader discussion on Robinhood's IPO, regulatory fines, and the Delta variant's transmission dynamics. The panel examined the dismissal of the FTC's antitrust lawsuit against Meta, debated the political implications of the Allen Weisselberg indictment and the 2024 Republican field, and criticized the Olympic Committee's suspension of Sha'Carri Richardson for marijuana use as bureaucratic overreach. Through these topics, the group highlighted a shared consensus on the need for pragmatic policy shifts, ranging from economic self-regulation in fintech to a rejection of zero-risk societal standards in public health.

  4. All-In Podcast10 min

    Leaked tapes: Sacks vs. Jason origins | All-In After Party on Callin

    Sacks, Jason, Chamath, Calacanis, Friedberg, Dylan, Henry, J.K.L., Tucker, Ringo

    During a recent "All-In" episode, panelists David Sacks, Henry Blodget, and David Pakman publicly criticized host Jason Calacanis for aggressive, non-even-handed interruptions that forced complex arguments into soundbites while allowing Chamath Palihapitiya to speak without constraint. In defense of his style, Calacanis claimed the chaos prevents boring segments and drives the show's top ratings, a tension that necessitates the panelists' editing work to reconstruct coherent narratives. The discussion further covered Calacanis's beta app "Call In," a dispute over the financial compensation for editors, and an unresolved debate regarding the establishment of specific time limits for uninterrupted speaking.