Lina Khan
Showing 1–3 of 3 transcripts.
- All-In Podcast1h 28m
E137: Inflation cools, market rips, Ripple/MSFT beat regulators, NATO summit, cocktails of youth
Chamath, Calacanis, Lina Khan, Zelensky, David Sacks
Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers and billionaire entrepreneurs debated the divergence between market expectations for rate cuts and their view that structural forces necessitate higher interest rates for the foreseeable future. The panel further dissected the fragility of the software sector, regulatory precedents set by the SEC and FTC, and geopolitical risks including NATO expansion and defense supply chains. Meanwhile, scientific breakthroughs in reversing cellular aging and details for the upcoming All-In Summit highlighted the intersection of biotech innovation and high-profile industry networking.
- All-In Podcast1h 28m
E129: Sam Altman plays chess with regulators, AI's "nuclear" potential, big pharma bundling & more
Sam Altman, Elon, Lina Khan, Chamath, David Friedberg, David Sacks
The All In podcast team debuted a new segment reading negative listener feedback from r/allin, where hosts faced harsh characterizations as wealthy elites or incompetent workers while also announcing their 2023 summit sold out. The group then analyzed Sam Altman's Senate testimony as a strategic regulatory moat to protect OpenAI against open-source competitors, though they noted that decentralized AI development makes centralized licensing impractical. Finally, the hosts discussed the collapsing San Francisco commercial real estate market, the FTC's anti-trust block on the Amgen-Horizon merger, and the diverging market reactions to Apple's new $3,000 AR headset.
- All-In Podcast1h 31m
E116: Toxic out-of-control trains, regulators, and AI
Lina Khan, Chamath, Calacanis, Friedberg, Jason
David Sacks and MrBeast raised $450,000 through live poker streams for charitable causes, sparking debate over media narratives regarding MrBeast's cataract surgery. The panelists also dissected the East Palestine train derailment, critiqued FTC Chair Lina Khan's regulatory approach, and analyzed the potential impact of the *Gonzalez v. Google* ruling on Section 230 and platform censorship. Finally, the discussion highlighted perceived political bias within OpenAI's safety filters, arguing that market competition and user-selected algorithms offer better solutions than government regulation for managing AI ethics.