Latest Interviews

Charity: how effective is giving?

Hilton Douglas, Paul Tudor Jones, Anand Giridharadas, Michael Bloomberg, Charles Koch, David, Rufus, Danny Chivers, Jennifer Johnston, Sarah

Record levels of wealth concentration have driven a surge in modern philanthropy where donors like Mark Zuckerberg and Michael Bloomberg demand immediate, tangible results from their multi-billion dollar pledges. While this trend has fueled record-breaking foundation spending and specific successes like the retirement of 289 coal plants, it simultaneously faces criticism for allowing billionaires to influence social policy while potentially perpetuating the economic inequalities they aim to fix. Alternative models such as effective altruism and the Funding Network seek to democratize giving through data-driven efficiency and live auctions, yet they struggle against declining donor participation and accusations that such structures undermine democratic principles.

How an obsession with home ownership can ruin the economy

Tim, Deanna, Diana, Christian Hilber, Anna

A comprehensive analysis challenges the traditional link between home ownership and the American Dream, arguing that high ownership rates distort housing markets and contribute to financial instability, as evidenced by Switzerland's competitive economy despite its low 38% ownership rate versus Britain's 66%. The report identifies post-WWII government subsidies and NIMBY behaviors as primary drivers of inflated prices and reduced labor mobility, ultimately linking these policies to the 2008 Global Financial Crisis and higher unemployment. While countries like Switzerland demonstrate that robust renter protections can offer economic alternatives, the speaker concludes that the West's obsession with ownership constitutes a significant policy error that requires redirecting public funds toward education, transport, and healthcare.

How kidnapping became a big business

Shane Anderson

Kidnap-for-ransom insurance has become a critical risk mitigation tool for over 75% of Fortune 500 companies, achieving a 98% safe retrieval rate while using strategic confidentiality to suppress ransom demands. The threat landscape in Mexico has evolved from targeting wealthy individuals to randomizing attacks against middle-class citizens due to gang fragmentation and a 99% impunity rate. Professional negotiators leverage local expertise to lower initial demands by approximately 10%, though most victims outside of corporate insurance policies remain vulnerable without such crisis intervention.

Why Britain's election won't end the political chaos

Facing the fourth general election in five years, the UK's political landscape is defined by a collapse of the traditional consensus following the Iraq War and 2008 financial crisis, which drove both the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn and the Conservatives under Boris Johnson toward extreme polarities. This polarization eliminates a viable center ground, creating a precarious environment where election outcomes may result in fragile coalitions or minority governments incapable of resolving economic stagnation or preventing constitutional fragmentation across Scotland and Northern Ireland. Ultimately, the nation confronts a future of sustained instability with no immediate prospect of returning to the moderate political center or addressing decade-long wage stagnation.

How to get migration right

Anna, Madeleine Sumption

This analysis contrasts Australia's points-based immigration system, which facilitated a 22-fold economic expansion alongside a 33% foreign-born population, with the United States' reliance on family reunification and rigid caps. While public discourse often polarizes around economic threats and cultural disruption, the Australian model demonstrates that strict border control combined with selective skilled migration can sustain high intake levels without recession. The discussion concludes by proposing policy mechanisms like earmarked migrant taxes or welfare restrictions to alleviate voter apprehension and prove the net economic benefit of unrestricted labor mobility.

Is America right to fear Huawei?

Ren Zhengfei, Joe Franell

Amidst a geopolitical clash where the US government labels Huawei a national security risk citing China's 2017 National Intelligence Law, the world's largest telecommunications manufacturer faces a 2019 ban on American components despite offering independent code audits. While Huawei's founder Ren Zhengfei acknowledges the resulting uncertainty, the company's cheaper 5G infrastructure remains critical for billions of users globally, including rural US networks. Analysts warn that excluding Huawei could fracture global supply chains and stall technological progress, yet the US administration maintains its stance to counter China's strategic rise in the telecommunications sector.

What sharks reveal about the state of the ocean

Todd Steiner, Dr. Kevin Weng, Randall Arauz, Geiner Golfin, Dr. Greg Stone, Dr. Richard Unsworth, Kevin Wang

Marine biologists in Costa Rica and the Phoenix Islands are utilizing acoustic tracking and coral resilience studies to advocate for expanding protected zones that safeguard critical migratory pathways for sharks and turtles. While researchers like Dr. Greg Stone identify naturally resilient ecosystems as strategic assets for climate adaptation, activists face significant enforcement challenges due to under-resourced patrols and powerful commercial fishing lobbies. These efforts aim to bridge the gap between current protected areas and global conservation needs by addressing rapid population declines and seagrass loss across multiple oceanic regions.

Rugby World Cup: why size matters

Rupert Murdoch, Jeremy Guscott, Manu Tuilagi, Joe Vokanasina, Professor Keith Stokes

The transition to professionalism in 1995 spurred a 10% increase in the average weight of Rugby Union England squad members, creating a faster game that doubled elite Australian injury rates and elevated concussion incidents to one per match by 2011. While regulatory bodies like the NFL and World Rugby have responded to catastrophic outcomes such as CTE and structural damage with stricter tackle rules and medical protocols, critics argue these measures remain insufficient against the inherent risks of larger, faster collisions. Ultimately, the ongoing tension between physical performance gains and athlete welfare questions the long-term viability of collision sports as players face increasingly severe injury consequences.

Drugs in sport: can science stop the cheats?

Yannis Pitsiladis, Ali Jawad

The World Anti-Doping Agency struggles to enforce rules against the International Olympic Committee's resistance while relying on evolving detection methods like the Athlete Biological Passport that capture only 1–2% of actual cases. High-profile admissions from athletes such as Marion Jones and Lance Armstrong, alongside whistleblower revelations, highlight a massive gap between official statistics and a 2011 survey suggesting 44% of competitors have doped. Although scientists like Dr. Yanis Pitsiladis are developing costly genetic sequencing to identify biomarker changes, severe funding limitations and rapid innovations in drug design continue to fuel a perpetual arms race between cheaters and authorities.

Doping in sport: why it can't be stopped

Grigory Rodchenkov, Richard McLaren, Alexander Zhukov, Pavel Kolobkov, Vitaly Mutko, Callum Skinner, Antoine Duval, Rob Keeler

Following the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics scandal, where whistleblower Grigory Rechenkov and the Richard McLaren report exposed a state-sponsored Russian doping conspiracy, systemic flaws in global sports governance have hindered effective enforcement. Critics argue that structural conflicts of interest between the IOC, WADA, and government bodies, combined with financial dependencies on broadcasting revenue, have allowed over 1,000 athletes to evade consequences despite overwhelming evidence of cheating. This disconnect has eroded athlete confidence, leading to concerns that anti-doping agencies prioritize institutional stability over fair competition.

How to help America's poor

Idris Kahloun, Lauren Jones, John Prideaux

A recent analysis reveals that the United States relies on an obsolete 55-year-old poverty metric that fails to account for modern expenses like childcare and housing, leaving one in six Americans, particularly children, trapped in geographically concentrated deprivation. Field observations in suburban communities like Waukegan illustrate how the "working poor" face severe instability despite owning assets, as rising costs for diapers, internet, and rent force families into desperate survival strategies. To address these systemic failures, experts propose replacing fragmented subsidies with universal child benefits, a policy shift argued to be both more cost-effective and politically viable than current means-tested approaches.

Why is there still poverty in America?

Anne Marie Mattis, Michael Bennett, Anna

A recent analysis reveals that nearly 40 million Americans, including one in six children, live in poverty with growing concentrations in suburbs that receive only a tenth of the funding allocated to urban areas. While historical safety net programs effectively reduced elderly poverty, the current system fails non-elderly populations compared to peers like Finland due to restrictive eligibility and a lack of flexible cash transfers for basic needs like diapers. Colorado Senator Michael Bennett has proposed a $300 monthly child stipend to address these gaps, highlighting that experts view the persistence of poverty not as an economic impossibility but as a deliberate political choice despite the nation's available resources.

Climate change: the trouble with trees

Isabella Tree, Simon Lewis, Sarah

While global reforestation pledges aim to combat climate change, analysis reveals that reliance on carbon-rich monoculture plantations drastically reduces sequestration potential compared to diverse natural forests. Contrasting the fertilizer-heavy conifer monocultures criticized in Ireland with community-led natural regeneration projects in Ethiopia and Sussex, experts argue that current carbon markets must shift incentives to support biodiverse ecosystems. Ultimately, restoring natural forests is presented as a vital but insufficient component of a broader climate strategy that still requires an immediate reduction in fossil fuel emissions to achieve net zero goals.

Who owns the Moon?

Dennis Hope, Vicky Jeong, Oliver Morton, Anna

Driven by geopolitical rivalry and plummeting launch costs, the international community is preparing for a surge of lunar missions targeting the South Pole to secure water and strategic minerals. While the 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits national ownership of the Moon, it leaves the legal status of resource extraction ambiguous, creating a landscape where nations like the US favor "finders keepers" principles over existing international precedents. This legal uncertainty and the potential for disputes mirroring terrestrial conflicts will likely persist until commercial operations, such as mining or tourism, become physically established on the surface.

Who will challenge Donald Trump in 2020?

Donald Trump, John Prideaux

The 2020 Democratic primary acts as a decisive ideological referendum that will narrow a large field to a nominee by September. Vice President Joe Biden leads as the moderate frontrunner focused on electability, while Senator Bernie Sanders and Senator Elizabeth Warren compete for progressive voters with distinct policy platforms. Secondary contenders including Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Senator Kamala Harris, Senator Amy Klobuchar, and Senator Cory Booker seek to capitalize on the race's central tension between generational change and broad electoral appeal.