Latest Interviews

What does gun violence in America look like?

Idris Kalloun, Maj Touré, Brea Smith

In 2017, U.S. gun deaths peaked at nearly 40,000 with suicides comprising 60% of the total, while stark racial disparities saw Black Americans face homicide rates ten times higher than white counterparts. Amidst rising Democratic proposals for assault weapon bans and universal background checks, activists urge the gun violence prevention movement to prioritize inner-city realities over media-centric mass shootings. Despite 67% public support for stricter regulations, congressional resistance persists ahead of the 2020 election even as states with robust laws, like California, report significantly lower suicide rates.

What will be the biggest stories of 2020?

In 2020, global markets confront recession risks from the US-China trade war while the US presidential election pivots on Wisconsin's swing status and Germany faces potential debt rule breaches. Simultaneously, cultural and institutional milestones include Beethoven's 250th birth anniversary, a WHO campaign for nurses amid a projected global shortage, and the Tokyo Olympics' controversial new transgender inclusion guidelines. These divergent themes highlight a year defined by economic instability, political realignment, and complex debates over human rights and biological definition.

How kidnapping became a big business

Shane Anderson

Kidnap-for-ransom insurance has become a critical risk mitigation tool for over 75% of Fortune 500 companies, achieving a 98% safe retrieval rate while using strategic confidentiality to suppress ransom demands. The threat landscape in Mexico has evolved from targeting wealthy individuals to randomizing attacks against middle-class citizens due to gang fragmentation and a 99% impunity rate. Professional negotiators leverage local expertise to lower initial demands by approximately 10%, though most victims outside of corporate insurance policies remain vulnerable without such crisis intervention.

UK Election: live Q&A with The Economist

Zanny Minton Beddoes, Adrian Wooldridge, Sarah Collinson

The Conservative Party secured a decisive majority with 364 seats, marking its largest electoral victory since the Margaret Thatcher era and triggering a dramatic realignment that collapsed the traditional Labour "Red Wall" in northern England. Led by Boris Johnson, the government now holds a clear mandate to finalize Brexit by January 31st while navigating the economic challenges of negotiating a permanent trade deal and balancing the conflicting interests of its new working-class and traditional southern voters. The outcome has stabilized financial markets and reshaped the UK's international relations by removing the threat of a Labour-led anti-NATO policy, positioning the nation for a renewed focus on the Anglosphere despite lingering uncertainties regarding long-term political durability.

Why Britain's election won't end the political chaos

Facing the fourth general election in five years, the UK's political landscape is defined by a collapse of the traditional consensus following the Iraq War and 2008 financial crisis, which drove both the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn and the Conservatives under Boris Johnson toward extreme polarities. This polarization eliminates a viable center ground, creating a precarious environment where election outcomes may result in fragile coalitions or minority governments incapable of resolving economic stagnation or preventing constitutional fragmentation across Scotland and Northern Ireland. Ultimately, the nation confronts a future of sustained instability with no immediate prospect of returning to the moderate political center or addressing decade-long wage stagnation.

How America politicised abortion

Driven by a surging political reliance on abortion as a defining issue, the conversation analyzes Missouri's impending status as the first U.S. state without legal clinics and the broader strategy by thirty-five Republican states to provoke a Supreme Court challenge. This legislative pressure targets the overturning of *Roe v. Wade* following the appointment of two conservative justices, a shift predicted to dismantle nationwide protections and return abortion regulation to individual states. As a result, cross-state safety nets are forming in refuge locations like Illinois while experts warn that dismantling legal frameworks will force patients toward dangerous illegal procedures and alter the demographic voting landscape permanently.

How migration could make the world richer

Asher, Anna, Beth, Michael Clemens, Giovanni Perri

Recent analysis indicates that removing global migration barriers could increase worldwide GDP by 50% to 150%, an economic gain far exceeding the potential from eliminating trade restrictions. Despite evidence that immigrants complement native workers and drive innovation without depressing wages, public overestimation of migrant populations continues to fuel restrictive policies that stifle global wealth creation. Experts now advocate for implementing regulated pathways similar to Australia's model, a shift projected to unlock trillions in economic value while fostering greater prosperity for developing nations.

How to get migration right

Anna, Madeleine Sumption

This analysis contrasts Australia's points-based immigration system, which facilitated a 22-fold economic expansion alongside a 33% foreign-born population, with the United States' reliance on family reunification and rigid caps. While public discourse often polarizes around economic threats and cultural disruption, the Australian model demonstrates that strict border control combined with selective skilled migration can sustain high intake levels without recession. The discussion concludes by proposing policy mechanisms like earmarked migrant taxes or welfare restrictions to alleviate voter apprehension and prove the net economic benefit of unrestricted labor mobility.

US-China trade war: live Q&A with The Economist

Soumaya Keynes, Henry Curr, Sarah, Sameah Kanes

The anticipated "Phase One" U.S.-China trade agreement has been delayed until next year after the cancellation of a critical summit between President Trump and Premier Xi removed the necessary political catalyst for resolution. With a December 15 tariff deadline approaching, the impasse risks triggering widespread tariff reimposition that shifts economic costs to U.S. importers and consumers while accelerating supply chain fragmentation. This prolonged conflict reflects a deepening bipartisan structural confrontation over China's state-led economic model, extending beyond trade into national security and technology control that continues to suppress global investment.

How modern families increase social inequality

Maggie, Joelle, Go Lee, Nguyen Thi Cam Thuy, Kim Dae Hyun, Jamie, Sean, Liam

Over the last fifty years, traditional family structures in wealthy nations have fundamentally shifted through the normalization of single-parent households, same-sex marriage, and a dramatic decline in fertility rates in countries like South Korea. These demographic transformations are increasingly stratified by class, with middle-class families maintaining stability through intensive parenting and high educational investment, while working-class communities face rising instability due to economic decline and diverging gender expectations. Experts warn that this growing divide creates a feedback loop of educational and social polarization, potentially leading to a future society lacking empathy between distinct economic segments.

America v China: why the trade war won't end soon

Soumaya Keynes, Deng Xiaoping, Trump, David Rennie, Chad Bowne, Samaya

After sixteen months of reciprocal tariffs triggered by US concerns over China's rapid economic ascent and alleged unfair trade practices, the conflict has escalated to impose 25% duties on billions of dollars in goods while specifically targeting the agricultural sector to influence political outcomes. The dispute has severely impacted global growth projections and business investment, with recent restrictions on tech firm Huawei and a stalled "phase one" deal highlighting the deep structural disagreements regarding intellectual property and market access. Analysts caution that while a limited agreement might offer temporary tariff relief, the fundamental clash over US dominance in future industries and China's state-led economic model suggests a prolonged stalemate without comprehensive resolution.

Is America right to fear Huawei?

Ren Zhengfei, Joe Franell

Amidst a geopolitical clash where the US government labels Huawei a national security risk citing China's 2017 National Intelligence Law, the world's largest telecommunications manufacturer faces a 2019 ban on American components despite offering independent code audits. While Huawei's founder Ren Zhengfei acknowledges the resulting uncertainty, the company's cheaper 5G infrastructure remains critical for billions of users globally, including rural US networks. Analysts warn that excluding Huawei could fracture global supply chains and stall technological progress, yet the US administration maintains its stance to counter China's strategic rise in the telecommunications sector.

What sharks reveal about the state of the ocean

Todd Steiner, Dr. Kevin Weng, Randall Arauz, Geiner Golfin, Dr. Greg Stone, Dr. Richard Unsworth, Kevin Wang

Marine biologists in Costa Rica and the Phoenix Islands are utilizing acoustic tracking and coral resilience studies to advocate for expanding protected zones that safeguard critical migratory pathways for sharks and turtles. While researchers like Dr. Greg Stone identify naturally resilient ecosystems as strategic assets for climate adaptation, activists face significant enforcement challenges due to under-resourced patrols and powerful commercial fishing lobbies. These efforts aim to bridge the gap between current protected areas and global conservation needs by addressing rapid population declines and seagrass loss across multiple oceanic regions.

Rugby World Cup: why size matters

Rupert Murdoch, Jeremy Guscott, Manu Tuilagi, Joe Vokanasina, Professor Keith Stokes

The transition to professionalism in 1995 spurred a 10% increase in the average weight of Rugby Union England squad members, creating a faster game that doubled elite Australian injury rates and elevated concussion incidents to one per match by 2011. While regulatory bodies like the NFL and World Rugby have responded to catastrophic outcomes such as CTE and structural damage with stricter tackle rules and medical protocols, critics argue these measures remain insufficient against the inherent risks of larger, faster collisions. Ultimately, the ongoing tension between physical performance gains and athlete welfare questions the long-term viability of collision sports as players face increasingly severe injury consequences.

Drugs in sport: can science stop the cheats?

Yannis Pitsiladis, Ali Jawad

The World Anti-Doping Agency struggles to enforce rules against the International Olympic Committee's resistance while relying on evolving detection methods like the Athlete Biological Passport that capture only 1–2% of actual cases. High-profile admissions from athletes such as Marion Jones and Lance Armstrong, alongside whistleblower revelations, highlight a massive gap between official statistics and a 2011 survey suggesting 44% of competitors have doped. Although scientists like Dr. Yanis Pitsiladis are developing costly genetic sequencing to identify biomarker changes, severe funding limitations and rapid innovations in drug design continue to fuel a perpetual arms race between cheaters and authorities.