newsfilter
← Interviews
Milken Institute53 min

Acid Rain to Asset Reign: The Business Case for Investing in Climate Change Technology

Spyros Kouvelis, Gísli Hauksson, Richard Mattison, Sabrina McCormick, Alisa Swidler, Peter, Abid Kamali, Hannah

Conference Presentation, Panel, Fireside Chat, Roundtable

Session Overview and Strategic Context

  • Moderator's Core Objective: Address the "valley of death" gap between investment incentives, policy making, and on-ground implementation to prevent good climate initiatives from lacking necessary funding.
  • Geopolitical Shift: The US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement has shifted the center of gravity for climate investment and technology eastward, with China leading in adopting and scaling solutions.
  • Interconnected Goals: Climate action must be integrated with the broader Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), linking energy, transportation, food production, and social/gender equity.
  • Emerging Technologies: Key focus areas include Artificial Intelligence (AI) with big data for tracking, blockchain for decision-making, and energy storage solutions like the world's largest battery commissioned in South Australia.

Geothermal Energy: Iceland Case Study (Gisli Hoxson)

  • Current Capacity: Iceland generates approximately 750 megawatts of geothermal power, constituting about one-third of national energy consumption and heating 80% of homes via district heating.
  • Economic Viability: Geothermal is currently economically viable on volcanic sites; advances in deep drilling technology are rapidly approaching a subsidy-free tipping point for non-volcanic regions.
  • Global Potential: Global geothermal capacity is currently ~13 gigawatts across 24 countries, with potential to reach 200 gigawatts economically given current technology (approx. 20% of hydropower capacity).
  • Investment Strategy: Gamma (managing $1.5 billion, with $100 million in geothermal) utilizes Icelandic expertise to fund early-stage research in Latin America via grant funding, de-risking private capital entry.
  • Deep Drilling Breakthrough: New drilling capabilities (targeting 8km depth) mimic the disruptive impact of fracking, potentially opening geothermal utilization globally beyond tectonic plates; a pilot project in Germany and a major district heating initiative in China (serving 3 million homes, aiming for 30 million) are underway.
  • Investment Dynamics: While the exploration phase remains high-capital and risky (traditionally funded by development agencies), the constant base-load nature of geothermal allows for longer off-take contracts, attracting increasing private equity interest.

Ocean Conservation and Humanitarian Impact (Alyssa Swidler)

  • Lake Chad Crisis: The lake has shrunk by 95% in 25 years due to climate change, triggering a humanitarian disaster involving drought, famine, disease, and the rise of Boko Haram in a region housing 100 million people.
  • Ocean SDG Initiative: The "Ocean Unite" campaign leverages brands like Virgin, Google Earth, and Leonardo DiCaprio to argue that poverty eradication requires safeguarding oceans, as they are the world's largest carbon sinks.
  • Climate-Humanitarian Link: Climate change drives ocean acidification and coral bleaching, directly causing 50–80% fish loss in Pacific Islands, necessitating a humanized approach to climate funding.
  • Funding Strategy: Advocates for incremental political will and funding over asking for "trillions," suggesting that recognizable brands can catalyze action more effectively than large-scale financial demands alone.

ESG Integration and Financial Data (Sabrina McCormick & Richard Mattison)

  • Belo Monte Dam Case Study: A $11 billion Brazilian hydro project illustrates critical ESG failures:
    • Social Risk: Massive displacement of indigenous populations led to decades of protests involving high-profile figures (e.g., James Cameron, Sting).
    • Climate Risk: Flooding releases methane, a GHG 30x more potent than CO2; however, methane emissions were not calculated in the project's initial impact assessment.
    • Financial Impact: Project costs escalated, licensing stalled due to corruption scandals involving former presidents, and current energy generation projections are 70% lower due to altered Amazon microclimates and droughts.
  • Investment Data Needs: Trucost (S&P) provides data on environmental externalities to inform capital reallocation; $120 billion of Swiss Re assets have shifted to ESG benchmarks, and the Japanese pension fund (GPIF) considers allocating 10% to ESG.
  • Policy Recommendations (EU):
    • Fiduciary Duty: The European Commission is consulting on incorporating ESG factors as a core part of investor fiduciary duty for asset managers and banks.
    • Green Taxonomy: A new classification system for "green" vs. "non-green" assets will be launched in December to provide market clarity and prevent "greenwashing."
    • Time Horizon Mismatch: Current regulations focus on short-term management, whereas asset owners (pension funds) have 30-year horizons; new policies aim to provide long-term risk data to align behavior with sustainable outcomes.
  • Market Impact: The Norwegian sovereign wealth fund's recommendation to divest from oil and gas demonstrated that single large asset owners can crash dependent energy markets, signaling a shift in capital allocation.

Q&A: Implementation and Communication

  • Taxonomy Specifics: The upcoming EU taxonomy will be detailed regarding climate mitigation and adaptation but remains a broad framework for all SDGs requiring further consultation on specific inclusions like nuclear or large-scale hydro.
  • De-risking Geothermal: While deep drilling improves resource identification, the initial exploration phase remains capital-intensive; a mix of public grants for early stages and private equity for later phases is currently necessary.
  • Communication Lessons: Public action is most effectively driven by framing climate change as a direct threat to personal and children's health rather than distant global impacts.
  • Urgency vs. Incrementalism: Consensus that while incremental steps are necessary, the speed of technological deployment and tool development must occur simultaneously; waiting for perfect policies before acting is not feasible given current climate trajectories.