newsfilter.io

Catherine Braille

Showing 13 of 3 transcripts.

  1. The Economist15 min

    Fertility crisis: why IVF isn't working

    Leslie Schrock, Deborah, Em, Catherine Braille, Dr. Hayashi Katsuhiko, Matt Chrysalof

    Driven by a global market exceeding $20 billion and rising infertility rates among delayed planners, the assisted reproductive technology sector currently relies on egg freezing while facing criticism over success rate transparency and physical risks. Emerging research into in vitro gametesis (IVG), led by scientists like Dr. Katsuhiko Hayashi and venture-backed firms such as Conception, aims to bypass these limitations by creating viable eggs from skin cells for aging populations and same-sex couples, despite unresolved ethical and genetic safety hurdles. Parallel investigations into biological aging mechanisms suggest future pharmaceutical interventions could eventually halt the decline of egg quality, though such applications remain distant from clinical reality.

  2. The Economist14 min

    Who should pay for a warming planet?

    Saúl, Yasser Mozby, Catherine Braille

    Accelerating climate disasters and stalled political action have driven a surge in climate litigation, with cases tripling from 83 in 2011 to 227 in 2021 to hold entities like German utility RWE liable for global emissions and compel government action. High-profile precedents include the September 2022 UN Human Rights Committee ruling against Australia for violating the rights of Torres Strait Islanders and Peruvian farmer Saúl Luciano Lliuya's suit seeking compensation for flood defenses. Despite legal hurdles regarding jurisdiction and causation in jurisdictions like the US, these lawsuits increasingly serve as strategic tools for Indigenous communities and vulnerable populations to pressure governments and corporations into accelerating adaptation and mitigation policies.

  3. The Economist11 min

    Climate change technology: is shading the earth too risky?

    Catherine Braille

    Proponents of solar geoengineering, including Harvard scientist David Keith, argue that reflecting sunlight into space is a necessary supplement to emission cuts for protecting vulnerable populations from extreme heat, while critics like the Sámi Council and experts such as Raymond Pierre Humbert warn that the technology creates severe ethical hazards, including moral hazard, indigenous rights violations, and geopolitical conflict. Tensions intensified after the Sámi Council successfully pressured Sweden's space agency to cancel a 2021 Harvard balloon test over their territory, highlighting the fundamental disagreement over whether research should proceed to mitigate "termination shock" risks or be halted to preserve global climate action integrity. As scientists explore localized solutions like marine cloud brightening on the Great Barrier Reef, the debate remains centered on establishing equitable governance frameworks to manage the technology's uncertain side effects and potential for catastrophic regional disruption.