Conference Presentation, Panel, Fireside Chat
Is Gender Parity Possible in the 21st Century?
Milken InstituteMolly Ashby, Geena Davis, Deborah DeHaas, Manju Ganeriwala, Ann McElaney-Johnson, Willow Bay, Kathleen Sullivan, Subha Barry, Dr. Nita Arindapol, Kelly McElhaney, Brenda Bates, Nancy, Chris McGrath
Current State of Gender Parity (Data & Trends)
- For every three male characters in family films, there is only one female character (3:1 ratio).
- Only 17% of crowd scenes in animated and live-action movies feature female characters.
- 81% of working characters in family films are men.
- In STEM roles within family films, the male-to-female character ratio is 15:1.
- Women hold approximately 17% of leadership positions across 10 major sectors (academia, law, politics, media, etc.).
- Federal representation: Women comprise 16% of the House and 17% of the Senate despite making up just over half the population.
- Corporate representation: Women hold only 4.2% of CEO positions in the overall business sector and 2.9% in the financial sector.
- Projected timeline for parity: At current rates, parity in business leadership would take 189 years, in Congress 500 years, and in media representation 700 years.
Root Causes & Barriers
- Media Influence: Children are exposed to an average of seven hours of media daily; seeing "Jane" (representing women) as a minority with few career options limits aspirations ("if you see it, you can be it").
- Application Gaps: Women tend to apply for leadership roles only when they meet 100% of qualifications, whereas men apply at 60%.
- Cultural Narratives: Persistent stereotypes hypersexualize young girls (observed as early as age six) and reinforce a binary choice between "brain" and "beauty."
- Workforce Retention: High turnover rates among women in some firms indicate a lack of perceived opportunity for success, rather than a departure from the workforce entirely.
- Decision-Making Age: Women often make career-limiting decisions regarding education and family in their early 20s before the issue of "balance" becomes a reality.
Strategic Solutions & Decisions
- Accountability Models: Citing Norway's board quota mandates as a successful precedent for enforcing timelines and consequences.
- Pipeline Development: Creating "diversity director databases" to funnel qualified diverse candidates to headhunters and boards to overcome the "can't find qualified people" excuse.
- Critical Mass: Moving beyond tokenism; panels suggest that one woman on a board is insufficient, whereas six women allow for dynamic decision-making ("one to make a motion, one to move it").
- Cultural Shift: Requiring leaders to "walk the talk" regarding flexibility and family leave (e.g., attending children's events openly) to normalize work-life integration.
- Content Strategy: Producers are urged to intentionally rewrite characters as female when gender isn't plot-dependent to normalize female leadership in media.
- Inclusion vs. Exclusion: Moving forward without creating disaffected groups; inclusion must be additive, not achieved by excluding men or other demographics.
Forward-Looking Statements & Future Goals
- Hillary Clinton's Vision: A goal for 50% of global elected and civic leadership positions to be held by women by 2050.
- Demographic Reality: Economic shifts (single-income households no longer viable) and the rise of women as primary earners create a business imperative for parity.
- Millennial Influence: The next generation of workers and consumers is expected to reject unfair environments, utilizing their "wallet power" and employment choices to force change.
- Education Focus: Emphasis on investing in early childhood (pre-K) and higher education to ensure women do not drop out of the pipeline at the doctoral/STEM level.
- Authenticity: A call for women to bring their "full self" to work, including family life and feminist identity, rather than mimicking masculine corporate styles.
Panelist Specific Insights
- Geena Davis (Geena Davis Institute): Emphasized that media images shape reality; if boys see equal representation, they will accept it as normal.
- Molly Ashby (Solera Capital): Noted that the "missing women" problem is a failure of retention and culture, not just hiring; called for a "5-year math challenge" for organizations to set parity goals.
- Deborah DeHaas (Deloitte): Stressed that inclusion is a business imperative driven by talent scarcity and that flexibility must be a cultural norm, not just a policy.
- Manju Ghaneriwala (Virginia State Treasurer): Highlighted the disparity in the finance sector and the need for transparency in government appointments to drive policy changes benefiting women.
- Anne McElhenney Johnson (Mount St. Mary's College): Advocated for education as the primary engine for economic mobility, particularly for first-generation and women of color.
- Audience Consensus: Participants agreed that "necessity" (e.g., in healthcare and finance) forces inclusivity, but voluntary "goodwill" is insufficient; structural accountability is required.