Paul Niehaus
Showing 1–2 of 2 transcripts.
- 80,000 Hours4h 7m
The best global health ideas we’ve heard on the show (from 17 experts)
Luisa, Karen Levy, Dean Spears, Sarah Eustis-Guthrie, Rachel Glennerster, Hannah Ritchie, Lucia Coulter, James Tibenderana, Varsha Venugopal, Alexander Berger, James Snowden, Paul Niehaus, Mushtaq Khan, Elie Hassenfeld, Leah Utyasheva, Shruti Rajagopalan, Claire Walsh, Louisa
Experts analyze global health interventions to reveal critical failures, such as the ineffective PlayPump technology and the underestimated risks of lead poisoning, alongside successful strategies like Sri Lanka's pesticide bans and community-driven vaccination campaigns. The discussion highlights the necessity of rigorous proof-of-concept testing, market-shaping mechanisms like Advanced Market Commitments, and the adaptation of solutions to local social determinants to prevent widespread harm. Furthermore, the event examines ethical tensions in philanthropic metrics, urging donors to prioritize evidence-based policies and long-term government engagement over superficial sustainability narratives.
- 80,000 Hours1h 48m
Do unconditional cash transfers cause economic growth in low-income countries? | Paul Niehaus (2023)
Paul Niehaus and USAID advocate for cash transfers as the default development strategy, supported by evidence that recipients in extreme poverty outperform traditional aid programs in asset accumulation, income generation, and subjective well-being. Recent large-scale experiments, including a UBI trial in Kenya, demonstrate a 2.5x economic multiplier effect and prove that unconditional cash does not discourage work while significantly reducing food insecurity. Although operational risks like fraud exist, organizations like GiveDirectly are addressing these through enhanced protocols and transparency, ultimately positioning cash transfers as a scalable, autonomy-respecting benchmark that forces the broader aid sector to improve its efficacy.