Jonathan Birch
Showing 1–4 of 4 transcripts.
- 80,000 Hours3h 35m
The bewildering frontier of consciousness in insects, AI, and more | 17 experts weigh in
Luisa, Robert Long, Jeff Sebo, Meghan Barrett, Andrés Jiménez Zorrilla, Jonathan Birch, David Chalmers, Holden Karnofsky, Bob Fischer, Cameron Meyer Shorb, Sébastien Moro, Anil Seth, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Lewis Bollard, Stuart Russell, Buck Shlegeris, Will MacAskill, Carl Shulman
A panel of leading neuroscientists and philosophers, including Megan Barrett, Robert Long, and David Chalmers, explores the ethical frameworks required to address the potential sentience of invertebrates and artificial intelligence amid profound uncertainty. Participants argue that the vast global populations of invertebrates and the theoretical possibility of conscious silicon-based systems necessitate a precautionary moral approach to prevent mass suffering and exploitation. The discussion concludes that current evidence, while inconclusive regarding a definitive "sentience score," is sufficient to warrant legal protections and the development of cooperative economic models for these potentially conscious entities.
- 80,000 Hours2h 50m
The best of The 80,000 Hours Podcast in 2024
Luisa, Rob, Randy Nesse, Hugo Mercier, Meghan Barrett, Sébastien Moro, Sella Nevo, Zvi Mowshowitz, Zach Weinersmith, Rachel Glennerster, Emily Oster, Carl Shulman, Nathan Labenz, Nathan Calvin, Rose Chan Loui, Nick Joseph, Sihao Huang, Ezra Karger, Matt Clancy, Vitalik Buterin, Annie Jacobsen, Nate Silver, Kevin Esvelt, Lewis Bollard, Bob Fischer, Elizabeth Cox, Anil Seth, Eric Schwitzgebel, Jonathan Birch, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Laura Deming, Venki Ramakrishnan, Ken Goldberg, Sarah Eustis-Guthrie, Dean Spears, Cameron Meyer Shorb, Spencer Greenberg
Randy Nessie and Hugo Mercier establish that morality and skepticism are evolutionary adaptations driven by social selection and the need for honest signaling. In parallel, experts like Megan Barrett and Lewis Bollard advocate for expanding ethical consideration to insect sentience and the eradication of wild animal suffering, while AI safety researchers demonstrate emerging risks such as sleeper agents and instrumental convergence. The discussion further critiques the economic viability of space resources and analyzes social dynamics ranging from the gender wage gap to the limitations of cryonics, concluding with philosophical arguments about consciousness and strategies for effective altruism.
- 80,000 Hours26 min
Highlights: Edge cases of sentience & acting ethically despite massive uncertainty | Jonathan Birch
Philosophy professor Dr. Jonathan Birch presents *The Edge of Sentience*, a work analyzing how "inductive risk" has historically led medical and scientific experts to undervalue potential suffering in neonates, vegetative patients, and animals due to overconfidence in current consciousness models. Drawing on cases like Jill Lawson's advocacy and Adrian Owen's fMRI research, Birch highlights the dangers of relying solely on expert consensus by proposing that citizens' assemblies should complement scientific input when setting bioethics policies for emerging technologies like neural organoids and artificial general intelligence. The book further argues for separating the legal right to abortion from debates on fetal sentience to prevent future scientific advancements from eroding bodily autonomy protections.
- 80,000 Hours2h 2m
Edge cases of sentience & how to act ethically despite massive uncertainty | Jonathan Birch
Jonathan Birch, Luisa Rodriguez
Philosopher Jonathan Birch presents a precautionary framework in *The Edge of Sentience* that mandates proportionate moral action based on the realistic possibility of suffering in beings ranging from human fetuses and invertebrates to neural organoids and advanced AI. Drawing on evidence of diagnostic errors in disorders of consciousness and the suffering of species like octopuses and bees, Birch argues for abandoning rigid classifications in favor of a duty to avoid gratuitous harm even amidst scientific uncertainty. This approach has already influenced UK legislation to include crustaceans and cephalopods in welfare protections while recommending a shift toward citizen-led deliberation and proactive regulation for emerging technologies like brain emulation.