Peter Godfrey-Smith
Showing 1–3 of 3 transcripts.
- 80,000 Hours3h 35m
The bewildering frontier of consciousness in insects, AI, and more | 17 experts weigh in
Luisa, Robert Long, Jeff Sebo, Meghan Barrett, Andrés Jiménez Zorrilla, Jonathan Birch, David Chalmers, Holden Karnofsky, Bob Fischer, Cameron Meyer Shorb, Sébastien Moro, Anil Seth, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Lewis Bollard, Stuart Russell, Buck Shlegeris, Will MacAskill, Carl Shulman
A panel of leading neuroscientists and philosophers, including Megan Barrett, Robert Long, and David Chalmers, explores the ethical frameworks required to address the potential sentience of invertebrates and artificial intelligence amid profound uncertainty. Participants argue that the vast global populations of invertebrates and the theoretical possibility of conscious silicon-based systems necessitate a precautionary moral approach to prevent mass suffering and exploitation. The discussion concludes that current evidence, while inconclusive regarding a definitive "sentience score," is sufficient to warrant legal protections and the development of cooperative economic models for these potentially conscious entities.
- 80,000 Hours2h 50m
The best of The 80,000 Hours Podcast in 2024
Luisa, Rob, Randy Nesse, Hugo Mercier, Meghan Barrett, Sébastien Moro, Sella Nevo, Zvi Mowshowitz, Zach Weinersmith, Rachel Glennerster, Emily Oster, Carl Shulman, Nathan Labenz, Nathan Calvin, Rose Chan Loui, Nick Joseph, Sihao Huang, Ezra Karger, Matt Clancy, Vitalik Buterin, Annie Jacobsen, Nate Silver, Kevin Esvelt, Lewis Bollard, Bob Fischer, Elizabeth Cox, Anil Seth, Eric Schwitzgebel, Jonathan Birch, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Laura Deming, Venki Ramakrishnan, Ken Goldberg, Sarah Eustis-Guthrie, Dean Spears, Cameron Meyer Shorb, Spencer Greenberg
Randy Nessie and Hugo Mercier establish that morality and skepticism are evolutionary adaptations driven by social selection and the need for honest signaling. In parallel, experts like Megan Barrett and Lewis Bollard advocate for expanding ethical consideration to insect sentience and the eradication of wild animal suffering, while AI safety researchers demonstrate emerging risks such as sleeper agents and instrumental convergence. The discussion further critiques the economic viability of space resources and analyzes social dynamics ranging from the gender wage gap to the limitations of cryonics, concluding with philosophical arguments about consciousness and strategies for effective altruism.
- 80,000 Hours1h 25m
Should we interfere with wild nature to reduce suffering? | Peter Godfrey-Smith
Peter Godfrey-Smith, Luisa Rodriguez
In a discussion with host Luisa Rodriguez, philosopher Peter Godfrey-Smith outlines the themes of his book *Living on Earth*, arguing for habitat preservation over active predation management while asserting that difficult wild experiences can hold redemptive value. He further distinguishes human technological uniqueness as a product of cumulative culture and the specific evolutionary advantage of the sea-to-land transition, contrasting this with the limitations faced by other intelligent species like octopuses and whales. The dialogue concludes with a shared view on the necessity of empirical research to guide future ethical decisions regarding wild animal welfare and the potential biological constraints on artificial sentience.